지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This essay intends to explore and discuss the viewpoints and the their difference of period classification and genre classification described in the important works which have been published up to now.
The most leading writers on Korean History of Theatre are Lee Do-Hyun, You Min-Young and Sea Yeon-Ho. And on the Period classification, the most contradictory point among these three writers is the concept of 'modem drama' and 'contemporary drama'. In my humble opinion on the starting point of the two dramas, it seems to be more advisable to contemplate from the more independent viewpoint and from the viewpoint of overcoming 'Tradition Discontinuity Theory'. Thus, I wonder if it would be agreeable to have Chang Geuk 'Eun-Se-Gye' performed in 1908 as the true starting point since there has been such an agreement that 'Eun-Se-Gye' showed the modem style and modernity awareness.
Similarly, the opinion that the starting point of contemporary drama is the beginning of 1960 is also rooted on the theatre atmosphere of the time which western style play such as Theatre of the absurd, Epic Theatre, and Theatre of cruelty were around. It appears to be plausible to see that the true changes in Korean Theatre have begun from 1970's with new discussion on tradition and creative inheritance of traditional play. Through this, it can be said that we have passed over to 'creative contemporary plays' from 'transplanted modem plays.'
On Genre division, there seems to be a great difference between A History of Korean Theatre written by Lee Doo-Hyun and A Complete History of Korean Theatre written by Sea Yeon-Ho. According to Lee, it is suggested that the greatest heritage of our traditional play is 'Mask Play', and he classified six types on the basis of lore type. While according to Sea, he roughly classified Gut, Talchum, Kkoktugaksinorum, Uheui and Pansori and as such they are all clearly differentiated. It seems remarkable that he established Gut as a separated form from Talchum and one form out of traditional play and also Uheui was highlighted as a meaningful genre.
As it comes to modem drama, Genre classification seems to be agreed for the most part. Sea, in the A Complete History of Korean Theatre described 'melodrama and Popular Theatre' / 'Chang Geuk and Ak Geuk' / Realistic Drama / Proletarian Drama / pro-Japanese Drama for modem drama. This classification appears to be acceptable for modem drama period, but it is exposed to have a big confusion as it comes to contemporary drama period yet. It should be necessary, on this period, to be more vigorously and attentively studied in the many more directions such as playwriters, directors, actors, theatrical companies, and theatres before it is put into shape as a part of history of modem drama.
The most leading writers on Korean History of Theatre are Lee Do-Hyun, You Min-Young and Sea Yeon-Ho. And on the Period classification, the most contradictory point among these three writers is the concept of 'modem drama' and 'contemporary drama'. In my humble opinion on the starting point of the two dramas, it seems to be more advisable to contemplate from the more independent viewpoint and from the viewpoint of overcoming 'Tradition Discontinuity Theory'. Thus, I wonder if it would be agreeable to have Chang Geuk 'Eun-Se-Gye' performed in 1908 as the true starting point since there has been such an agreement that 'Eun-Se-Gye' showed the modem style and modernity awareness.
Similarly, the opinion that the starting point of contemporary drama is the beginning of 1960 is also rooted on the theatre atmosphere of the time which western style play such as Theatre of the absurd, Epic Theatre, and Theatre of cruelty were around. It appears to be plausible to see that the true changes in Korean Theatre have begun from 1970's with new discussion on tradition and creative inheritance of traditional play. Through this, it can be said that we have passed over to 'creative contemporary plays' from 'transplanted modem plays.'
On Genre division, there seems to be a great difference between A History of Korean Theatre written by Lee Doo-Hyun and A Complete History of Korean Theatre written by Sea Yeon-Ho. According to Lee, it is suggested that the greatest heritage of our traditional play is 'Mask Play', and he classified six types on the basis of lore type. While according to Sea, he roughly classified Gut, Talchum, Kkoktugaksinorum, Uheui and Pansori and as such they are all clearly differentiated. It seems remarkable that he established Gut as a separated form from Talchum and one form out of traditional play and also Uheui was highlighted as a meaningful genre.
As it comes to modem drama, Genre classification seems to be agreed for the most part. Sea, in the A Complete History of Korean Theatre described 'melodrama and Popular Theatre' / 'Chang Geuk and Ak Geuk' / Realistic Drama / Proletarian Drama / pro-Japanese Drama for modem drama. This classification appears to be acceptable for modem drama period, but it is exposed to have a big confusion as it comes to contemporary drama period yet. It should be necessary, on this period, to be more vigorously and attentively studied in the many more directions such as playwriters, directors, actors, theatrical companies, and theatres before it is put into shape as a part of history of modem drama.
목차
1. 한국연극사의 주요 저작
2. 한국연극사의 주요 쟁점
3. 연극사 서술의 과제들
〈참고문헌〉
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
전통극과 사실주의: 한국 근대극 운동 지도자들의 인식
외국문학연구
2005 .11
-
60/70년대 한국의 독일 희곡 소용 - 경제개발, 유신정국과 독일 연극
독일어문학
2004 .01
-
History of the Korean Theatre : Transitional Period Leading to the Modern Theatre 1902-1919
International Journal of Korean History
2003 .08
-
1920년대~30년대의 번역이론 연구 : 유럽 희곡의 수용과정을 중심으로
외국문학연구
2004 .02
-
History of Korean Drama
Korea Journal
1964 .06
-
The Reception of British-American Dramas and Its Influence on Modern Korean Theatre
Korea Journal
1988 .04
-
자아인식을 위한 교육연극 연행 방법 탐구 : ‘비가시적 연극’ 기법을 활용하여
국어교육연구
2008 .08
-
Korean Traditional Theatre and Madanggŭk Theatre
Korea Journal
1997 .09
-
한국근대연극과 미디어의 관련 양상 - 1920년대 『조선일보』를 중심으로 -
한국현대문학연구
2005 .06
-
Toward a Modern Society : History of the Korean Theatre in the Modern Period 1919~1940
International Journal of Korean History
2004 .12
-
Originality and Modernity of Korean Theatre : A Study on Oh Tae-suk`s Dramas
Korea Journal
1997 .09
-
Sixty Years of New Drama in Korea
Korea Journal
1969 .03
-
일제 말기 국민연극의 존재 형식과 공연 구조
한국현대문학연구
2007 .12
-
Process Drama
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .12
-
북한연극의 실태와 원리에 관한 고찰
한국학연구
2002 .06
-
Theatre of the Audience : English Early Modern Theatre and Korean Ground Theatre
동서비교문학저널
2009 .12
-
페미니스트 드라마의 배경과 특징
영어영문학21
2010 .01
-
Problems of Korean Drama : Its Present and Future
Korea Journal
1962 .08
-
한, 일 근대극의 비교연구 : 1910∼20년대의 양상을 중심으로
일어일문학
2016 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
유민영의 한국 연극사 연구
홍창수
한국학연구
2012
.12
1956~57년도, 한국 현대연극사의 변화 : 한국연극 100년-다시 읽고싶은 연극론ㆍ비평選 12
이진순
공연과리뷰
2011
.06
[한국연극 100년 다시 읽고 싶은 연극론 · 비평選 25] 미학적 측면에서의 한국 소극장운동의 흐름 : 이념, 혹은 생존? 우리의 소극장은 저항하지 않는다
김방옥
공연과리뷰
2015
.09
한국의 뉴 밀레니엄 셰익스피어
이현우
Shakespeare Review
2012
.09
근대기의 한국연극과 한국 근대극운동의 특징
장원재
,
백로라
한국문학과 예술
2009
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-710-002117802