지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This writing reviews the significance of the 《A Study of the Yangbanin Early Yi Dynasty》-which was written by Yi S?ng Mu(李成茂)-in the context of academic research history.
YI S?ng Mu intended to understand the social characteristics of the Ch?sun Dynasty through the research on the Yangban which had led the Ch?sun Dynasty as the highest class of the dynasty. Especially, he suggested specific and substantial description of the Yangban, for whom only abstract understanding had prevailed up to that time, through objective and systematic understanding. In addition, he made conclusions on the social status of the Yangban and the characteristics of the society after comprehensively reviewing several aspects related with the Yangban-such as concept and formation of the Yangban, relationship of the Yangban with the national examination/governmental system/military service, owner ship of the land and the like-without being confined to a certain aspect. His study helped us to overcome the previously negative and abstract understanding on the Yangban and form comprehensive and objective concept on it from the perspective of history. After his study on the Yangban, the efforts to figure out the characteristics of the society of the early Ch?sun Dynasty as well as the study on the Yangban improved significantly.
However, there are some controversial points to review in his study. Firstly, even though he explained that there had been distinction in the social status between the good people(良身分) and the base people(賤身分) on the basis of the legal system, he said the social distinction between the Yangban and the Yangin(良人) was more important actually and practically. If so, it is necessary to review whether the meaning and concept on the basis of the legal system and on the basis of practicality is identical. Also, it is necessary to review whether the concept of the social status and the social class is identical. In addition, it is required to review whether there also had been a ruling social status like the Yangban in the Kory? Dynasty while the need for review on the lower social class like the middle class(中人層) arises.
He intended to define the Yangban from the perspective of the actual reality of the Ch?sun Dynasty as well as from the perspective of legal and social system. It was very important accomplishment but on the contrary his argument could have been more complete only if more specific supporting details had been provided. Furthermore, it is indispensible to review the Muban(武班) and the relationship between the Yangban and the Nobi(奴婢) to understand the Yangban in its entirety. Lastly, he defined the nobility as the upper ruling class. If so, a question on how to define the characteristics of the Ch?sun Dynasty arises.
Even if there can be some controversies as aforementioned, he significantly contributed to the study on the Yangban and the society of the early Ch?sun Dynasty and his study provided many implications for the study on the Yangban after his time.
YI S?ng Mu intended to understand the social characteristics of the Ch?sun Dynasty through the research on the Yangban which had led the Ch?sun Dynasty as the highest class of the dynasty. Especially, he suggested specific and substantial description of the Yangban, for whom only abstract understanding had prevailed up to that time, through objective and systematic understanding. In addition, he made conclusions on the social status of the Yangban and the characteristics of the society after comprehensively reviewing several aspects related with the Yangban-such as concept and formation of the Yangban, relationship of the Yangban with the national examination/governmental system/military service, owner ship of the land and the like-without being confined to a certain aspect. His study helped us to overcome the previously negative and abstract understanding on the Yangban and form comprehensive and objective concept on it from the perspective of history. After his study on the Yangban, the efforts to figure out the characteristics of the society of the early Ch?sun Dynasty as well as the study on the Yangban improved significantly.
However, there are some controversial points to review in his study. Firstly, even though he explained that there had been distinction in the social status between the good people(良身分) and the base people(賤身分) on the basis of the legal system, he said the social distinction between the Yangban and the Yangin(良人) was more important actually and practically. If so, it is necessary to review whether the meaning and concept on the basis of the legal system and on the basis of practicality is identical. Also, it is necessary to review whether the concept of the social status and the social class is identical. In addition, it is required to review whether there also had been a ruling social status like the Yangban in the Kory? Dynasty while the need for review on the lower social class like the middle class(中人層) arises.
He intended to define the Yangban from the perspective of the actual reality of the Ch?sun Dynasty as well as from the perspective of legal and social system. It was very important accomplishment but on the contrary his argument could have been more complete only if more specific supporting details had been provided. Furthermore, it is indispensible to review the Muban(武班) and the relationship between the Yangban and the Nobi(奴婢) to understand the Yangban in its entirety. Lastly, he defined the nobility as the upper ruling class. If so, a question on how to define the characteristics of the Ch?sun Dynasty arises.
Even if there can be some controversies as aforementioned, he significantly contributed to the study on the Yangban and the society of the early Ch?sun Dynasty and his study provided many implications for the study on the Yangban after his time.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 양반에 대한 종합적ㆍ체계적 이해
Ⅲ. 몇 가지 고려해야 할 문제들
Ⅳ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Concept of History and as Seen by Korean Yangban
Korea Journal
1977 .09
-
良賤制說의 대두와 조선 초기 사회구조에 대한 새로운 이해 : 韓永愚의 『朝鮮初期 社會經濟硏究』
한국사연구
2009 .09
-
양반을 향한 긴 여정 : 조선 후기 어느 하천민 가계의 성장
역사비평
2012 .02
-
1900년대 ｢光武戶籍｣의 ‘士’와 ｢民籍｣의 ‘兩班’ 기재
대동문화연구
2013 .01
-
18~19세기 ‘지배양반’ 되기의 다양한 조건들
대동문화연구
2005 .01
-
조선후기 입양의 확산 추이와 수용 양상
역사와현실
2009 .09
-
朝鮮初期 兩班硏究, 李成茂 著, 一潮閣刊 1980年 2月 菊版 424面
한국사연구
1980 .09
-
<蔡世英이야기>를 통해본 16세기 風流世態의 한 단면
한국문학논총
2004 .01
-
高麗 兩班社會와 한국사의 時代區分
역사학보
2000 .06
-
朝鮮後期 兩班身分 移動에 關한 硏究(上) : 丹誠帳籍을 中心으로
역사학보
1982 .12
-
20세기 후반 양반의 성격변화와 재실의 건립 : 청도군 수야리의 사례를 중심으로
지방사와 지방문화
2014 .05
-
朝鮮後期 兩班身分 移動에 關한 硏究(下) : 丹誠帳籍을 中心으로
역사학보
1983 .03
-
Yangban as an Upwardly Open Elite Status Group : Historical-Structural Tracking in Comparative Perspective
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
1998 .09
-
카자흐스탄 고려인 극작가 한진의 고전 수용 양상 : 「량반전」과 「토끼의 모험」을 중심으로
국어국문학
2012 .12
-
Mask Dance Charms Spirits, Ridicules Yangban Class
Korea Journal
1963 .02
-
조선 초기 循資法의 정비와 운영
역사학보
2016 .03
-
16세기 士族層의 관직 독점과 班常制의 대두
한국사연구
1999 .09
-
조선후기 중앙군제의 운영과 숙종대 양반충군론
군사연구
2016 .01
-
16, 17世紀 兩班家 婦人의 田畓賣買 活動
한국사연구
2008 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018887266