지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
I have to say and writing in undergraduate courses in the liberal arts students in the process of running important to note that in reality, what the orientation of education should be writing're gonna go to this research as one of the problems was. To be addressed in writing to the author is primarily the creation of content, but it's important for the reason that the framework of the discussion agreed that the ultimate goal of writing and, in particular the formation and to improve writing nonjeungjeok phase model of classroom discussion designed to operate in and saw the actual classes.
Speaking of education and discussion of the reasons for their ability to efficiently deliver power to the community baeyanghal is the main means. Therefore, the debate on education nonjeungjeok writing are at the most critical things to do, in other words, the discussion by writing nonjeungjeok need to raise awareness and discussion of the process by which ideas and their logical and systematic argument gadadeum can be. That almost all complex in terms of the debate on the underlying theme is of a different opinion to make sure they can reveal valuable lessons and methods can be inspiring. Discussion of the problems seem obvious to navigate, and the diversity of human experience and knowledge to understand and faithfully give a big help. Above all, the debate is one of the best way to promote growth. Because the debate is collaborating with other people only by cooperating can we access the new point of view, is the premise of the idea.
In our class discussion of the type (CEDA Chan - a controversial way) configured to fit the space was attracting the participation of the audience. All seats in the middle of the cold room. Van Discussion team place and sit down facing each other, dividing the audience sitting on either side of the discussions at the team 'nalgaehyeong' was the placement of the space. Classes in our class do not own the panelists for a discussion with Joe Chan. Half of each organization, five men were 10, and therefore has a 3-4 conference discussion topics, such as classes were in progress, In addition, the panelists and the audience (we do not participate in the discussion, students were named to the jury.) So that they can participate actively in class discussions to assess the role of discussion and evaluation grant to submit to the panelist and the audience were all given a rating.
The discussion in the class of learners to participate more actively want to have the opportunity to be many more. However, the lack of training for their discussion in class is to have a vague uneasiness, or even skeptical. Did not properly prepare for class discussions are in progress the complaint often ruined the class will listen. Communication skills through writing and speaking of the formation and improvement of teaching and the objectives and the research gaps in the bongo to complement more effective in speaking and writing classes because of the methodology will be utilized to.
Speaking of education and discussion of the reasons for their ability to efficiently deliver power to the community baeyanghal is the main means. Therefore, the debate on education nonjeungjeok writing are at the most critical things to do, in other words, the discussion by writing nonjeungjeok need to raise awareness and discussion of the process by which ideas and their logical and systematic argument gadadeum can be. That almost all complex in terms of the debate on the underlying theme is of a different opinion to make sure they can reveal valuable lessons and methods can be inspiring. Discussion of the problems seem obvious to navigate, and the diversity of human experience and knowledge to understand and faithfully give a big help. Above all, the debate is one of the best way to promote growth. Because the debate is collaborating with other people only by cooperating can we access the new point of view, is the premise of the idea.
In our class discussion of the type (CEDA Chan - a controversial way) configured to fit the space was attracting the participation of the audience. All seats in the middle of the cold room. Van Discussion team place and sit down facing each other, dividing the audience sitting on either side of the discussions at the team 'nalgaehyeong' was the placement of the space. Classes in our class do not own the panelists for a discussion with Joe Chan. Half of each organization, five men were 10, and therefore has a 3-4 conference discussion topics, such as classes were in progress, In addition, the panelists and the audience (we do not participate in the discussion, students were named to the jury.) So that they can participate actively in class discussions to assess the role of discussion and evaluation grant to submit to the panelist and the audience were all given a rating.
The discussion in the class of learners to participate more actively want to have the opportunity to be many more. However, the lack of training for their discussion in class is to have a vague uneasiness, or even skeptical. Did not properly prepare for class discussions are in progress the complaint often ruined the class will listen. Communication skills through writing and speaking of the formation and improvement of teaching and the objectives and the research gaps in the bongo to complement more effective in speaking and writing classes because of the methodology will be utilized to.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 토론에 대한 이해
Ⅲ. 토론 수업의 설계
Ⅳ. 토론 수업의 진행
Ⅴ. 토론 수업 이후의 수업
Ⅵ. 결론
참고 문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고급 단계 한국어 학습자를 위한 토론 수업 방안
이중언어학
2006 .01
-
사이버대학 영어수업 토론방에서 집단크기에 따른 참여도 차이
영어교과교육
2011 .01
-
토론
어학연구
1986 .08
-
토론
어학연구
1982 .12
-
독서토론 수업 사례와 수업 후 작문 자료 고찰
겨레어문학
2019 .01
-
초·중·고등학생들의 쓰기수업 인식 및 실태조사 연구
국어교육연구
2014 .10
-
웹기반 교양 관광영어 과목에서 토론방 학습자경험공유를 통한 문화/언어적 이해증진
인문학연구
2015 .06
-
자연계열 대학 글쓰기 수업의 창의성 활용 사례 - 충남대학교 교과 <자연과학글쓰기> 수업을 중심으로
어문연구
2019 .01
-
대학생의 글쓰기 실태조사와 효율적인 지도방안 연구
국어교육연구
2006 .08
-
종합토론
역사교육
1993 .12
-
종합토론
한국학연구
1996 .12
-
종합토론
한국학연구
1995 .12
-
영어 논쟁적 글쓰기에 미치는 사전 활동별 효과
영어교과교육
2014 .01
-
For the Discussion of Korean Music
Korea Journal
1984 .02
-
플립드 러닝(Flipped Learning)을 기반으로 한역할 교체식 토의 수업 방안 연구
우리말연구
2014 .01
-
문법 토론 학습 활성화 방안 탐색: 온라인 토론과 피드백의 관계를 중심으로
언어와 정보사회
2019 .01
-
論評 및 綜合討論
한국독립운동사연구
1992 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-802-018990893