지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis aims to consider the problem of peace from the perspective of multitude, which is diametrically opposed to that of sovereignty.
According to Hobbes, the first theorist of sovereignty, the state or commonwealth is formed when multitudes become a people by giving up their powers and rights to the sovereign, in order to come out of the state of civil war and secure the state of peace and safety. Thus, from the time of its birth, sovereignty has the relation between the ruler and the ruled as its internal contradiction. Nevertheless, with Hobbes, the period of war is definitely distinguished from that of peace: when there is peace, there is no war, and when there is war, there is no peace.
In the postmodern age, however, with the transformation of the modern sovereignty into the imperial sovereignty, the outside of the sovereignty has disappeared and the aforesaid internal contradiction has expanded on a global scale. This process has brought with it a new form of war. As there is no outside to the imperial sovereignty, this new war has the nature of a global civil war (or global police action), and becomes a system of bio-power in that it even organizes a society and builds a social order for 'security.'
Now the relation between war and peace differs from that of the modern period. War is the condition for peace, which means, war and peace are the two sides of the same coin. So to rely on this kind of peace means to rely on war, and, considering the immense destructive power of contemporary weapon systems, to rely on war can lead to the threatening of the existence of the whole mankind.
Peace and security, in the true sense of the words, should be invented as a state wholly different from that of the war-made false peace and security. For this, it is necessary to fight against all wars, reject the capitalist logic of competition for material interests, and to free ourselves from the shackles of sovereignty. What is more important, we should make every effort to create, maintain and expand the zone of autonomous life based on creative collaboration across the state borders.
These efforts of the multitude to construct a common body wholly different from the state will simultaneously move the history in the direction of replacing the pouvoir constitue of the state with pouvoir constituant of the multitude.
According to Hobbes, the first theorist of sovereignty, the state or commonwealth is formed when multitudes become a people by giving up their powers and rights to the sovereign, in order to come out of the state of civil war and secure the state of peace and safety. Thus, from the time of its birth, sovereignty has the relation between the ruler and the ruled as its internal contradiction. Nevertheless, with Hobbes, the period of war is definitely distinguished from that of peace: when there is peace, there is no war, and when there is war, there is no peace.
In the postmodern age, however, with the transformation of the modern sovereignty into the imperial sovereignty, the outside of the sovereignty has disappeared and the aforesaid internal contradiction has expanded on a global scale. This process has brought with it a new form of war. As there is no outside to the imperial sovereignty, this new war has the nature of a global civil war (or global police action), and becomes a system of bio-power in that it even organizes a society and builds a social order for 'security.'
Now the relation between war and peace differs from that of the modern period. War is the condition for peace, which means, war and peace are the two sides of the same coin. So to rely on this kind of peace means to rely on war, and, considering the immense destructive power of contemporary weapon systems, to rely on war can lead to the threatening of the existence of the whole mankind.
Peace and security, in the true sense of the words, should be invented as a state wholly different from that of the war-made false peace and security. For this, it is necessary to fight against all wars, reject the capitalist logic of competition for material interests, and to free ourselves from the shackles of sovereignty. What is more important, we should make every effort to create, maintain and expand the zone of autonomous life based on creative collaboration across the state borders.
These efforts of the multitude to construct a common body wholly different from the state will simultaneously move the history in the direction of replacing the pouvoir constitue of the state with pouvoir constituant of the multitude.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 주권의 발생 : 다중과 ‘민‘(people)
Ⅲ. 정상적 통치기술이 된 예외상태와 주권의 변형
Ⅳ. 새로운 전쟁의 탄생
Ⅴ. 평화의 새로운 창안을 위하여
Ⅵ. 맺는말: 동아시아 지역에서 평화의 가능성
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
길선주의 “平和의 曙”(1922)에 나타난 ‘평화’와 ‘의’(義) 분석
생명과 말씀
2019 .01
-
평화사란 무엇인가?
역사비평
2014 .02
-
역사교육과 평화교육의 만남 : 서독의 사례를 중심으로
역사교육
2001 .12
-
20세기 초 한국의 평화론
역사비평
2014 .02
-
냉전 초기 사회주의진영 내부의 전쟁·평화 담론의 충돌과 북한의 한국전쟁 인식 변화
역사와현실
2012 .03
-
전쟁과 평화 그리고 정의
철학연구
2005 .03
-
평화의 감성과 개념의 은유적 이해
담화와인지
2020 .02
-
여성주의 관점에서 본 한국에서의 평화의 의미
역사교육
2005 .06
-
평화통일을 위한 교회교육의 방향 모색
기독교교육정보
2009 .12
-
Towards a Working Peace System on the Korean Peninsula : A Perspective on the Theory of Peace States
Korea Journal
2011 .06
-
6·25 전쟁~1950년대 후반 북한의 평화운동
역사와현실
2014 .03
-
동양평화론의 논의 기저와 역사상
역사와현실
2014 .12
-
한국 기독교 평화 교육의 반성과 방향
한국기독교신학논총
2002 .04
-
한국전쟁기 전쟁시의 국가주의의 시선
한국시학연구
2008 .04
-
Beyond Violence, Holding The Vision of Peace and Life Attempt of Christian Peace Network
Journal of Christian Education & Information Technology
2004 .10
-
반전(反戰), 평화를 위한 신학적 성찰
한국기독교신학논총
2002 .10
-
초등학교 아동의 평화와 전쟁 개념 이해에 대한 연구
생애학회지
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-910-001598034