지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article has studied on what kind of values one will possess upon reading the piece Hojil(호질) through the history of idea flow in the 17<SUP>th</SUP> century-18<SUP>th</SUP> century. Joseon in this periodwent through efforts for ideological changes and in particular, the rise of Wang Yangming philosophy needs close attention. The reason for this is that as Confucianism, which supported Joseon, started to fall, it is the period when Wang Yangming philosophy started becoming recognized as an official philosophy to substitute Confucianism. As this history of idea flow acts as element of foundation of the piece, it has a special meaning.
In the pieceare two characters who establish a tense relationship. In the piece, the tiger and Bugoaseonsaeng(북곽선생)rule the world with clear distinctions and try to meet each other but fails. The process of the two characters trying to meet and the result holds important narrative form of the piece. Such trait can be seen when the tiger reproves humans. Such characteristic can be seen as the tiger is shown criticizing Bugoaseonsaeng (북곽선생), using words that were used in ideological issues.
The tiger criticizes the human world based on Wang Yangming ideology. Bugoaseonsaeng (북곽선생), who hears that criticism, has ideas based on Confucianism. Such Bugoaseonsaeng (북곽선생), based on Confucianism, has nothing to say against the tiger’s Wang Yangming philosophical criticism. The two worlds meeting and trying to make up but failing has much to do with the history of idea flows. The reason that two worlds, Confucianism and Wang Yangming philosophy, in this piece seems to be the result of ideological situation that took place in Joseon in the 17<SUP>th</SUP> century-18<SUP>th</SUP> century. Thus, the introduction and development of Wang Yangming philosophy acts as an important ideological foundation making up the piece.
In the pieceare two characters who establish a tense relationship. In the piece, the tiger and Bugoaseonsaeng(북곽선생)rule the world with clear distinctions and try to meet each other but fails. The process of the two characters trying to meet and the result holds important narrative form of the piece. Such trait can be seen when the tiger reproves humans. Such characteristic can be seen as the tiger is shown criticizing Bugoaseonsaeng (북곽선생), using words that were used in ideological issues.
The tiger criticizes the human world based on Wang Yangming ideology. Bugoaseonsaeng (북곽선생), who hears that criticism, has ideas based on Confucianism. Such Bugoaseonsaeng (북곽선생), based on Confucianism, has nothing to say against the tiger’s Wang Yangming philosophical criticism. The two worlds meeting and trying to make up but failing has much to do with the history of idea flows. The reason that two worlds, Confucianism and Wang Yangming philosophy, in this piece seems to be the result of ideological situation that took place in Joseon in the 17<SUP>th</SUP> century-18<SUP>th</SUP> century. Thus, the introduction and development of Wang Yangming philosophy acts as an important ideological foundation making up the piece.
목차
1. 서론
2. 작품 창작 시기의 사상적 동향
3. 작품에 나타난 두 세계
4. 작품의 사상적 기반
5. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
'유사 자유주의'를 향한 호질을 읽고
철학연구회 학술발표논문집
1999 .06
-
생태비평의 관점에서 본 「호질」
한국한문학연구
2018 .01
-
백암 박은식 사상의 양명학적 특징과 도덕교육적 함의 : 『왕양명선생실기(王陽明先生實記)』를 중심으로
퇴계학논집
2018 .01
-
『장자(莊子)』와 <호질(虎叱)>의 스토리텔링
스토리앤이미지텔링
2015 .06
-
현대 한국에서의 양명학 연구의 신지평
양명학
2019 .09
-
鄭寅普의 朝鮮陽明學派 硏究에 관한 一考察
인문과학연구
2009 .12
-
연암사상에 보이는 양명학과 도가철학의 회통성
양명학
2009 .12
-
阳明后学研究的新标杆 -《心·学·政—明代黔中王学思想研究》审读报告
유학연구
2017 .01
-
과정철학에서 본 주자학과 양명학
동양철학연구
2010 .01
-
양명학에서 본 주체성의 문제
철학연구
1991 .12
-
Foundations in Thought and Values : How We Differ
Korea Journal
1977 .12
-
<호질>과 <양반전>의 우언과 풍자 대한 보론(補論)
동양고전연구
2017 .01
-
양명학의 시대정신- 최근 언론에 보도된 한국사회의 문제를중심으로 -
유학연구
2018 .01
-
조선조 양명학의 수용과 연구 현황
양명학
2004 .08
-
李匡師 문학의 사상적 배경과 陽明學의 흔적
한국인물사연구
2008 .09
-
양명학의 전파와 조선지식인 사회의 대응 ―전래와 수용과정에서 나타난 학술사상적 쟁점을 중심으로―
동양철학
2005 .01
-
조선시대 反양명학 문헌 조사 및 추출을 통한 양명학 비판 내용의 성향 분석과 反양명학 사조의 흐름에 나타난 특징 연구[2] : 南溪 朴世采ㆍ南唐 韓元震ㆍ石亭 李定稷의 ‘文獻’을 중심으로
양명학
2015 .04
-
"양명학에서 본 주체성의 문제"에 대한 논평
철학연구
1991 .12
-
朝鮮後期의 蕩平政治와 陽明學政治思想 -鄭齊斗의 양명학과 蕩平政治論-
동방학지
2002 .01
-
한국근대양명학에 관한 연구 현황과 전망
유학연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-810-001648429