지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The March 1st movement became a Korean tradition, through various commemorative ceremonies which hugely contributed to the people's reliving of the moment and to the revitalization of their memories of the March 1st movement. People staged commemorative demonstrations in the streets and plazas, or held commemorative ceremonies at prearranged places with formal programs. The former style was usually seen in Korea, Japan and before 1925 inside the Littoral province of Siberia, while the later was mostly witnessed in China, the U.S. and post-1926 Siberia.
The size and details of the commemorative ceremonies significantly differed from one another, and also in terms of places and time periods. In places where there were many Korean brethren in the area, and where security and space for the ceremony were ensured, ceremonies were held rather big. Yet with a smaller Korean population the size of the ceremony also became smaller, and at some times external conditions forced the size and fashion of the ceremony to change.
In consideration of all this, it is attempted in this article to reconstruct all the details of a formal commemorative ceremony meant to honor the March 1st movement, based upon the examples of ceremonies that were held in Shanghai and the Littoral province of Siberia. Through such task, it is confirmed that in such ceremonies the Taegeuk-gi flag and the Aeguk-ga national anthem were repeatedly displayed, and the Proclamation of Independence was read, in order to let the participants relive the day of 1919. Although the left wing party members and the right wing party members clashed with each other over the interpretation of certain symbolic meanings that the March 1st movement represented, in popular ceremonies such gaps were immediately filled and frustrations were summarily mended. But such gap resurfaced after the liberation, and became even more evident with both the Southern and Northern halves of the Korean peninsula newly witnessing the foundation of their own half-governments. This does not mean that there weren't any gaps and differences between the Left's and Right's envisioning of the historic meaning of the March 1st movement before the liberation. It should be noted that it was more like the left wing party failing to create their own convention of a commemorative ceremony for the March 1st movement, based upon their own view of the history
The size and details of the commemorative ceremonies significantly differed from one another, and also in terms of places and time periods. In places where there were many Korean brethren in the area, and where security and space for the ceremony were ensured, ceremonies were held rather big. Yet with a smaller Korean population the size of the ceremony also became smaller, and at some times external conditions forced the size and fashion of the ceremony to change.
In consideration of all this, it is attempted in this article to reconstruct all the details of a formal commemorative ceremony meant to honor the March 1st movement, based upon the examples of ceremonies that were held in Shanghai and the Littoral province of Siberia. Through such task, it is confirmed that in such ceremonies the Taegeuk-gi flag and the Aeguk-ga national anthem were repeatedly displayed, and the Proclamation of Independence was read, in order to let the participants relive the day of 1919. Although the left wing party members and the right wing party members clashed with each other over the interpretation of certain symbolic meanings that the March 1st movement represented, in popular ceremonies such gaps were immediately filled and frustrations were summarily mended. But such gap resurfaced after the liberation, and became even more evident with both the Southern and Northern halves of the Korean peninsula newly witnessing the foundation of their own half-governments. This does not mean that there weren't any gaps and differences between the Left's and Right's envisioning of the historic meaning of the March 1st movement before the liberation. It should be noted that it was more like the left wing party failing to create their own convention of a commemorative ceremony for the March 1st movement, based upon their own view of the history
목차
머리말 : 3월 1일의 비극
1. 3ㆍ1운동 기념 방식
2. 기념식 전경
3. 기념식의 의미와 변화
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
3 · 1운동 수업 동향과 전망
역사교육
2019 .09
-
조선후기 순조의 幸行과 儀禮的 성격
역사와실학
2007 .12
-
대한민국정부의 3·1절 기념의례와 3·1운동 표상화(1949～1987)
사학연구
2017 .12
-
해방 직후 좌·우익의 역사 만들기와 기념 투쟁
역사연구
2017 .06
-
3·1운동 100년의 ‘봄·밤’에 ‘바람’ -박찬승과 권보드래의 3·1운동 서사
역사비평
2019 .11
-
Discourse in Ceysa : From a worship to a commemorative ceremony
언어
2006 .06
-
북한 정부의 3‧1운동 기념과 표상 - 『로동신문』(1946~2019)을 중심으로 -
동방학지
2020 .01
-
Understanding the March 1 Movement
Korea Journal
1966 .03
-
March 1st Movement and its impact on Chinese May 4th Revolution ②
Korea Journal
1971 .02
-
March 1st Movement and its Impact on Chinese May 4th Revolution
Korea Journal
1971 .01
-
The March 1st Movement and the Red Thread of International Peace History
Korea Observer
2019 .01
-
해방 후 역사 교과서의 3ㆍ1운동 관련 서술 경향
역사와현실
2009 .12
-
대한민국정부의 3·1절 기념의례와 3·1운동 표상화(1988～2017)
사학연구
2018 .09
-
‘비폭력의 스펙터클’을 넘어서 -3·1운동 100주년의 폭력론
역사비평
2019 .11
-
안재홍의 ‘己未運動’과 임정법통성의 역사의식
한국인물사연구
2012 .09
-
1920년대 삼일운동에 관한 기억 -시간, 장소 그리고 ‘민족/민중’
역사와현실
2009 .12
-
3·1運動期 國內 秘密結社運動에 대한 試論
한국독립운동사연구
1988 .11
-
다도교육 프로그램의 효과성에 관한 메타분석 연구
차문화산업학
2020 .01
-
3·1운동 100주년의 연구와 ‘3·1혁명론’
역사비평
2020 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-001688181