메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김해경 (우리경관문화연구실)
저널정보
서울시립대학교 서울학연구소 서울학연구 서울학연구 제39호
발행연도
2010.5
수록면
79 - 117 (39page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It has been over 100 years since the concept of a park was introduced into Korea. The park meant a historical and cultural property when it was first introduced. Yet, we now plan a park only with present eyes that privilege usage and utility. On the other hand, the spatiality of a park is a concept based on usage and utility and it is changed and reproduced by social contexts. Moreover, the spatiality can be changed and distorted by the demands and claims of diverse constituencies and users. Therefore, one needs a systematic investigation about the changes of spatiality to plan a park with historical significance. This study analyzes the mechanism and accumulated spatialities that had driven the changes and accommodation of the Hyochang Park. The Hyochang-myo has had diverse spatialities. It was a royal burial ground in the Chosun dynasty and became a park during the Japanese colonial period. After the independence, it was recovered to an ancestral burial ground. Yet, since the 1980s, it has been again transformed into a cultural property and an ecological place. The planning and renovation of the Hyochang Park have been conducted mainly by the demands of interest groups or political powers, which usually involved the elimination of the previous legacy to establish a new one. Therefore, the past memories of the Hyochang Park have been constantly demolished. Although the name ‘Hyochang’, attributed to the place in the Chosun period, still remains, the memory of the ‘Hyochang-myo’ of the Chosun period is not there any more. Yet, it would not be right to choose only one spatial identity for the place when we make the future of the Hyochang Park. The preservation of it as a cultural property, a designation for a sanctuary, and the maintenance of a neighborhood park could all be a valid claim for its mixed identity. So, more researches on a variety of techniques and methods and that would fully recover the memories and t\he legacies of the park with a mixed identity should be
performed.

목차

I. 序論
II. 효창공원의 변천 과정 해석
III. 효창공원의 장소성 변화
IV. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (81)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-000830661