지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to examine changes in Baekje's policy against Goguryeo and the relationship between the two nations in the wake of the shift of power holders in King Jeonji's reign in the first half of the 5th century. To this end the study tried to look into Baekje's enforcement of its policy against Goguryeo, focusing on the features of those who came to power when King Jeonji successfully struggled for the throne, and Baekje's policy against Goguryeo and the circumstances of the both nations in the first half of 5th the century.
After King Asin's passed away in 405, a struggle for the throne was initiated in Baekje. It was attributed to the absence of an apparent successor to the throne and the conflicts between power holders and the royal family, but different standpoints on the nation's policy against Goguryeo more than anything else were cited as an important cause for the struggle. Along the way, the clan "Hae" emerged as a new power holder, taking advantage of the defeat of the clan "Jin" who had previously led military confrontation against Goguryeo.
During King Jeonji's reign, the clan "Hae," as an operator of Baekje's policies, participated in the nation's decision making towards Goguryeo. They maintained a moderate line on Goguryeo in consideration of Baekje's impoverished internal conditions, their understanding based on their knowledge and positions and their determination to continue to lead the nation. Accordingly, Baekje tried to indirectly keep Goguryeo in check, refraining from its direct military confrontation with Goguryeo and reinforcing its multinational diplomacy with dynasties in southern China and Japan.
As a result of Baekje's changed policy against Goguryeo, no war broke out between the two nations for a half century after King Jeonji's accession to the throne, bringing the two nations to a state of lull. This was possible thanks to the intentions of the clan "Hae" who exercised a dominating power in Baekje in the first half of the 5th century. In the meantime, Goguryeo's unwillingness to stage a war against Baekje in the face of the changes of international circumstances in the first half of the 5th century also contributed to creating such conditions between the two nations.
After King Asin's passed away in 405, a struggle for the throne was initiated in Baekje. It was attributed to the absence of an apparent successor to the throne and the conflicts between power holders and the royal family, but different standpoints on the nation's policy against Goguryeo more than anything else were cited as an important cause for the struggle. Along the way, the clan "Hae" emerged as a new power holder, taking advantage of the defeat of the clan "Jin" who had previously led military confrontation against Goguryeo.
During King Jeonji's reign, the clan "Hae," as an operator of Baekje's policies, participated in the nation's decision making towards Goguryeo. They maintained a moderate line on Goguryeo in consideration of Baekje's impoverished internal conditions, their understanding based on their knowledge and positions and their determination to continue to lead the nation. Accordingly, Baekje tried to indirectly keep Goguryeo in check, refraining from its direct military confrontation with Goguryeo and reinforcing its multinational diplomacy with dynasties in southern China and Japan.
As a result of Baekje's changed policy against Goguryeo, no war broke out between the two nations for a half century after King Jeonji's accession to the throne, bringing the two nations to a state of lull. This was possible thanks to the intentions of the clan "Hae" who exercised a dominating power in Baekje in the first half of the 5th century. In the meantime, Goguryeo's unwillingness to stage a war against Baekje in the face of the changes of international circumstances in the first half of the 5th century also contributed to creating such conditions between the two nations.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 전지왕 즉위를 둘러싼 왕위계승분쟁
Ⅲ. 해씨세력의 대두와 대고구려관
Ⅳ. 전지왕대의 대외정책과 고구려
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (52)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 盧重國 / 1981 / 高句麗･百濟･新羅사이의 力關係變化에 대한 一考察 / 東方學志 28
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 金秉柱 / 1984 / 羅濟同盟에 관한 硏究 / 韓國史硏究 46
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 盧泰敦 / 1984 / 5～6世紀 東아시아의 國際情勢와 高句麗의 對外關係 / 東方學志 44
4. [단행본] - 朴燦圭 / 2002 / 廣開土王代 高句麗와 百濟의 關係 in: 廣開土王과 高句麗 南進政策 / 學硏文化社
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 盧重國 / 2005 / 4～5세기 백제의 성장･발전과 삼국의 각축 / 鄕土서울 66
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 金秉柱 / 1984 / 羅濟同盟에 관한 硏究 / 韓國史硏究 46
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 盧泰敦 / 1984 / 5～6世紀 東아시아의 國際情勢와 高句麗의 對外關係 / 東方學志 44
4. [단행본] - 朴燦圭 / 2002 / 廣開土王代 高句麗와 百濟의 關係 in: 廣開土王과 高句麗 南進政策 / 學硏文化社
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 盧重國 / 2005 / 4～5세기 백제의 성장･발전과 삼국의 각축 / 鄕土서울 66
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
5세기 중후반 백제의 대외관계
역사와현실
2007 .03
-
廣開土王代의 南方 政策과 韓半島 諸國 및 倭의 動向
한국고대사연구
2012 .09
-
永樂 6년 고구려의 백제 침공 원인에 대한 검토 - 〈廣開土王碑〉 辛卯年 기사의 재해석을 중심으로 -
목간과문자
2020 .06
-
韓ㆍ中 記錄에 나타난 高句麗의 正統性과 그 意味 : 建國始祖神話와 民俗을 중심으로
동아인문학
2004 .12
-
신라는 삼국을 통일하려고 하였을까
역사비평
2019 .08
-
660년대 고구려의 대남방 전략
대구사학
2018 .01
-
백제와 고구려 고지에 대한 당의 지배 양상
역사와현실
2010 .12
-
유물ㆍ유적을 통해 본 百濟建國說話
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2001 .09
-
백제 멸망 이후 馬韓 인식의 변화 양상
한국고대사연구
2015 .03
-
고구려 붕괴 후 그 유민의 거취 문제
한국고대사연구
2004 .03
-
가야 諸國과 고구려의 관계
한국고대사연구
2020 .06
-
4~7세기 백제의 경계와 그 변화 -경기와 충청지역을 중심으로-
백제문화
2018 .01
-
中國 正史 속의 高句麗-중국의 고구려 귀속 논리에 대한 문헌사적 검토-
고조선단군학
2004 .06
-
International Situation in East Asia and Changes in Goguryeo’s Foreign Policy
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2004 .12
-
4~5世紀 高句麗의 南方進出과 對新羅 關係
고구려발해연구
2012 .11
-
고구려와 북조의 조공관계 성격
한국사학보
2019 .05
-
5~6세기 백제의 중층적 묘제교류와 그 정치적 상호작용
한국사학보
2013 .11
-
중국계 백제관료에 대한 고찰
史叢(사총)
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002060158