지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
From the perspectives of research ethics in biomedical science, this article analyzes the Korean scientists' therapeutic cloning published in Science magazine in February, 2004. This article critically examines the research from various angles: source of 242 oocytes allegedly used for the research; IRB's research protocol review and approval; funding source of the research; authorship of the publication; and researcher's integrity. To specify, this article raises the following eight ethical questions:
1) Who donated those oocytes? Why have the egg donors not been compensated for their donation?
2) As a Nature magazine's interview article in May 2004 reports, is it true that a couple of young female researchers donated their eggs for the research?
3) Did the researchers take the appropriate steps to obtain voluntary informed consent from the oocytes donors?
4) Did the IRB at Hanyang University hospital in Seoul, Korea properly fulfill their responsibility both in reviewing and approving research protocol?
5) There does not exist an IRB at Seoul National University College of Veterinary Medicine, where the principal investigator of the human embryonic cloning belongs. With no IRB approval, how was the research made a legitimate one?
6) The researchers claim that their research was financially supported by an anonymous sponsor. But the acknowledgement of the Science magazine article states that the authors thank for the supports from the 3 different government research projects, which misleads people to believe that the Korean government endorses their research. What is the truth?
7) There are 15 co-authors in the Science magazine article, which includes Ms. Ky Young Park, far from an expert in this field, who has recently been appointed to be a Science & Technology Advisor to the Korean President Roh. Isn't that strange?
8) Two key researchers, W.S.Hwang and S.Y.Moon, are members of Ethics Committee of the Stem Cell Research Center, a government-funded institute. In May 2003, the center publicized the research guideline, which strictly prohibits creating human embryo for research purpose. Why did the researchers contradict themselves in doing research?
1) Who donated those oocytes? Why have the egg donors not been compensated for their donation?
2) As a Nature magazine's interview article in May 2004 reports, is it true that a couple of young female researchers donated their eggs for the research?
3) Did the researchers take the appropriate steps to obtain voluntary informed consent from the oocytes donors?
4) Did the IRB at Hanyang University hospital in Seoul, Korea properly fulfill their responsibility both in reviewing and approving research protocol?
5) There does not exist an IRB at Seoul National University College of Veterinary Medicine, where the principal investigator of the human embryonic cloning belongs. With no IRB approval, how was the research made a legitimate one?
6) The researchers claim that their research was financially supported by an anonymous sponsor. But the acknowledgement of the Science magazine article states that the authors thank for the supports from the 3 different government research projects, which misleads people to believe that the Korean government endorses their research. What is the truth?
7) There are 15 co-authors in the Science magazine article, which includes Ms. Ky Young Park, far from an expert in this field, who has recently been appointed to be a Science & Technology Advisor to the Korean President Roh. Isn't that strange?
8) Two key researchers, W.S.Hwang and S.Y.Moon, are members of Ethics Committee of the Stem Cell Research Center, a government-funded institute. In May 2003, the center publicized the research guideline, which strictly prohibits creating human embryo for research purpose. Why did the researchers contradict themselves in doing research?
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 사례 분석
Ⅲ. 맺음말
〈첨부〉한국생명윤리학회 치료용 인간배아복제 연구윤리특별위원회 성명성(2004.5.22)에 포함된 12개항의 질문
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
줄기세포 연구의 윤리적 문제에 대한 연구자들의 인식조사
생명윤리
2006 .06
-
기관생명윤리심의위원회 구성 및 운영의 개선방안
생명윤리
2006 .06
-
인간배아연구윤리강령 개발에 관한 연구
생명윤리
2005 .06
-
영국의 줄기세포연구에 관한 윤리와 법정책 : 역사적 배경과 현황
생명윤리
2005 .06
-
웨스턴 연구윤리심의위원회의 특성
생명윤리
2007 .06
-
과학기술 시대의 연구윤리 : 생명공학분야를 중심으로
생명윤리
2001 .12
-
人間胚芽複製의 問題點과 解決方案 : 生命倫理法의 改善方案을 中心으로
생명윤리
2005 .06
-
기관별 심의위원회 체계에 대한 도전과 선진 각국의 대응
생명윤리
2012 .07
-
줄기세포 연구자의 연구 윤리 일반에 관한 인식 및 절차
생명윤리
2008 .12
-
공용기관생명윤리위원회의 과제와 개선방향
생명, 윤리와 정책
2017 .10
-
Design of the community model based on the subjects in the fields of bioscience by the linking the heterogeneous contents
한국콘텐츠학회 ICCC 논문집
2009 .12
-
의생명과학연구에서 이해갈등(conflict of interest)의 윤리적 문제
생명윤리
2006 .12
-
Recruiting members of IRBs on embryo research in Korea
생명윤리
2008 .12
-
인체 및 인체구성물 연구의 윤리와 연구 정책
생명윤리
2000 .05
-
연구윤리 정착을 위한 정책방향에 관한 연구
디지털융복합연구
2014 .01
-
일본의 연구윤리 : 연구지침 위반에 대한 기관의 최근 대응 사례를 중심으로
생명윤리
2008 .12
-
배아줄기세포연구와 젠더 : 난자제공과 여성의 노동 및 참여를 중심으로
페미니즘 연구
2007 .04
-
Ethical Concern in International Qualitative Health Research
질적연구
2007 .12
-
생물학적 정체성 : 면역작용과 생명세포의 일체성
생명윤리
2002 .12
-
인간 유전체 기능 연구의 법적 문제
생명윤리
2002 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-570-002566990