지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper analyzes why Terauchimasadake(寺內總督), Governor-general of Chosun(朝鮮), maintained the policy of coercive nation discrimination in spite of his self-avowed ruling philosophy of gradual assimilationism during the early 1910s.
Terauchi held a historical view that the ancestors of Japan and Korea are identical. At this time, this view was connected with his conception that Chosun was very stagnant and therefore couldn't achieve a national independence. On the basis of this view, he asserted frequently that the imperial Japan could assimilate korea and the two nations, Japan and Korea, could be amalgamated into one. But he didn't have intention to carry out the policy of assimilationism totally in Korea. He judged that the total application of assimilationism to Korea was difficult, because the standard of Korean people was low, their national identification was very strong and their anti-Japan sentiment was not subdued. On the ground of this judgement, Terauchi adopted the policy of gradual assimilationism.
However, the problem is that the gradual assimilationism itself was not carried out as a policy, though it was sloganized. Two points came out as the cause. On the one hand, Japan did not possess the power to assimilate Korea. On the other hand, the Korean people's strong sentiment for national identification and against Japanese imperialism deterred the drive of gradual assimilationism. Therefore, Terauchi selected the policy of coercive nation discrimination as the keynote of colonial policy. The policy was based upon the discriminative colonial rule which put its ruling subjects into three categories : the Japanese in Japan, the Japanese in Korea and the Korean. As a result, Terauchi's gendarmerie police system became the means and basis which kept up the policy of coercive nation discrimination.
Terauchi held a historical view that the ancestors of Japan and Korea are identical. At this time, this view was connected with his conception that Chosun was very stagnant and therefore couldn't achieve a national independence. On the basis of this view, he asserted frequently that the imperial Japan could assimilate korea and the two nations, Japan and Korea, could be amalgamated into one. But he didn't have intention to carry out the policy of assimilationism totally in Korea. He judged that the total application of assimilationism to Korea was difficult, because the standard of Korean people was low, their national identification was very strong and their anti-Japan sentiment was not subdued. On the ground of this judgement, Terauchi adopted the policy of gradual assimilationism.
However, the problem is that the gradual assimilationism itself was not carried out as a policy, though it was sloganized. Two points came out as the cause. On the one hand, Japan did not possess the power to assimilate Korea. On the other hand, the Korean people's strong sentiment for national identification and against Japanese imperialism deterred the drive of gradual assimilationism. Therefore, Terauchi selected the policy of coercive nation discrimination as the keynote of colonial policy. The policy was based upon the discriminative colonial rule which put its ruling subjects into three categories : the Japanese in Japan, the Japanese in Korea and the Korean. As a result, Terauchi's gendarmerie police system became the means and basis which kept up the policy of coercive nation discrimination.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 韓國觀과 漸進的 民族同化論
Ⅲ. 民族差別 暴壓政策
Ⅳ. 맺음말
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
朝鮮總督 寺內正毅論
한국독립운동사연구
1992 .12
-
도고 미노루(東鄕實)의 식민정책론 : 농업식민론과 ‘비동화주의’
역사교육
2013 .09
-
1920년대 일제의 동화정책과 일본시찰단
한국독립운동사연구
2007 .06
-
4년제 보통학교를 통한 일제의 동화와 차별교육― 조선총독부 편찬 4년제 보통학교 교과서를 중심으로 ―
日本語敎育
2018 .01
-
Korea and Japan
Korea Journal
1967 .08
-
스즈키 다케오(鈴木武雄)의 식민지조선근대화론
韓國史學史學報
2014 .01
-
North Korea’s Policy Toward the United Nations
Korea Journal
1995 .03
-
태평양전쟁시기 조선에서의 생산증강 정책과 그 실상
역사와경계
2004 .09
-
러일전쟁 이후 일본의 한국식민론과 식민주의적 문명론
동양사학연구
2006 .03
-
Explaining a Roller Coaster Change in ROK’s Policy toward Japan: Morality/Threat Perception Nexus and the Kim Young-sam Government’s Japan Policy
Korea Observer
2016 .01
-
태평양전쟁기 미국의 複眼的 視覺과 한국사회 인식 : 식민지 근대화 논쟁에 부쳐
한국사연구
2006 .09
-
Higher Education Policies in Korea, 1945-83
Korea Journal
1983 .10
-
Korean Studies in Japan
Korea Journal
1985 .12
-
한ㆍ일관계의 역사적 전개와 전망 : 해방후 현재까지 역대 정권별 일본에 대한 대응을 중심으로
한국민족문화
2001 .12
-
America`s Korea Policy and the United Nations, 1947-1948
Korea Journal
1984 .06
-
언론을 통해 본 한일협정 인식 50년
역사비평
2015 .05
-
한일협정 후 한국 지식인의 일본 인식
동북아역사논총
2011 .09
-
개화기(1876~1910) 한국인의 일본관
사학연구
2004 .12
-
일본의 ‘문화입국론’과 쿨ㆍ재팬 전략
일본연구
2013 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002269866