지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
One of the most important functions of the ICC Court of Arbitration is the choice of arbitrators. In particular, where the parties fail to agree to jointly nominate a sole arbitrator or the chairman of the Arbitral tribunal, the Court shall make the appointment upon the proposal of a National Committee.
When the Court is to select an appropriate National Committee, the Court considers the prospective arbitrator's nationality, residence and other relationships with the countries of which the parties or other arbitrators are nationals in accordance with the ICC Rules of Arbitration.
The purpose of this paper is to identify the factors which the Court considers when it is to select a National Committee in practice. These factors include the nationalities of the parties and counsels, if any, as well as the party-appointed arbitrators, the language of arbitration, the place of arbitration (the prospective arbitrator's residence), the governing law etc.
From a number of examples discussed in the chapter 4 of this paper, in particular, drawn from the experiences of arbitrators nominated by the ICC National Committees of Switzerland, Belgium and Austria, we can see the practical facts as follow:
First, the sole arbitrator or the chairman of the Arbitral Tribunal tends to be of a nationality other than that of the parties and other players in the arbitral procedure such as counsel and any party-appointed arbitrators, unless the parties do not otherwise object.
Second, the prospective third arbitrator's command of the language(s) of arbitration is a very important factor, especially when the case involves many parties and the parties fail to agree on the language of arbitration.
Third, depending on the nature of the dispute and among other factors, the amount of the dispute, the Court tends to seek an arbitrator who resides near the place of arbitration.
Lastly, the Court tends to seek an arbitrator who is familiar with the law applicable to the arbitration or, at a minimum, has expertise or experience in a com￢parable legal system.
When the Court is to select an appropriate National Committee, the Court considers the prospective arbitrator's nationality, residence and other relationships with the countries of which the parties or other arbitrators are nationals in accordance with the ICC Rules of Arbitration.
The purpose of this paper is to identify the factors which the Court considers when it is to select a National Committee in practice. These factors include the nationalities of the parties and counsels, if any, as well as the party-appointed arbitrators, the language of arbitration, the place of arbitration (the prospective arbitrator's residence), the governing law etc.
From a number of examples discussed in the chapter 4 of this paper, in particular, drawn from the experiences of arbitrators nominated by the ICC National Committees of Switzerland, Belgium and Austria, we can see the practical facts as follow:
First, the sole arbitrator or the chairman of the Arbitral Tribunal tends to be of a nationality other than that of the parties and other players in the arbitral procedure such as counsel and any party-appointed arbitrators, unless the parties do not otherwise object.
Second, the prospective third arbitrator's command of the language(s) of arbitration is a very important factor, especially when the case involves many parties and the parties fail to agree on the language of arbitration.
Third, depending on the nature of the dispute and among other factors, the amount of the dispute, the Court tends to seek an arbitrator who resides near the place of arbitration.
Lastly, the Court tends to seek an arbitrator who is familiar with the law applicable to the arbitration or, at a minimum, has expertise or experience in a com￢parable legal system.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중재법원의 제3중재인 선정과 국내위원회
Ⅲ. 중재법원의 국내위원회 선정기준
Ⅳ. 시사점
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (12)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김용일 / 2006 / 국제상사중재에서 중재인 선정에 관한 비교연구 -국제중재규칙을 중심으로 / 통상정보연구 8 (3)
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 오원석 / 2007 / ICC 중재에서 중재법원의 중재판정 검토(Scrutiny) 제도에 관한 연구 / 무역학회지 32 (1)
3. [단행본] - Briner,R. / 2005 / Constitution of The Arbitral Tribunal in ICC Arbitration in : ICC-SIAC SYMPOSIUM Institutional Arbitration in Asia, Singapore / International Arbitration Center
4. [단행본] - B?ler, M. / 2005 / Handbook of ICC Arbitration / Sweet & Maxwell
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Castineira,E.,Petsche,M / 2006 / The Language of the Arbitration:Reflections on the Selection of Arbitrators and Procedural Efficiency / International Court of Arbitration Bulletin 17 (1)
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 오원석 / 2007 / ICC 중재에서 중재법원의 중재판정 검토(Scrutiny) 제도에 관한 연구 / 무역학회지 32 (1)
3. [단행본] - Briner,R. / 2005 / Constitution of The Arbitral Tribunal in ICC Arbitration in : ICC-SIAC SYMPOSIUM Institutional Arbitration in Asia, Singapore / International Arbitration Center
4. [단행본] - B?ler, M. / 2005 / Handbook of ICC Arbitration / Sweet & Maxwell
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Castineira,E.,Petsche,M / 2006 / The Language of the Arbitration:Reflections on the Selection of Arbitrators and Procedural Efficiency / International Court of Arbitration Bulletin 17 (1)
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한·미간 중재인 문제로 인한 중재판정 취소의 소 비교분석
무역학회지
2011 .11
-
국제상사중재에서 중재인선정 방식에 관한 연구
중재연구
2010 .01
-
중재인의 중재절차 진행상 유의사항에 관한 연구 - 대한상사중재원의 절차를 중심으로 -
중재연구
2012 .01
-
중재인에 대한 기피
중재연구
2007 .01
-
국제중재법규상의 중재인선정계약에 따른 중재판정부의 중재권한에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2004 .10
-
중재인 선정과 기피에 관한 연구
무역연구
2014 .01
-
ICC중재의 주요특징과 KCAB중재의 활성화 방안에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2007 .02
-
중국 중재제도의 특징에 관한 소고
중재연구
2005 .01
-
한․중․미 중재인의 선정 및 기피에 관한 비교연구
중재연구
2011 .01
-
중재인선정 및 분야별 중재인 특성에 관한 연구
중재연구
2009 .01
-
중재인의 기피에 관한 고찰
중재연구
2004 .01
-
국제중재인의 자격과 양성방안에 관한 연구
중재연구
2015 .01
-
국제중재제도에서 중재인의 의무에 관한 소고
문화산업연구
2007 .06
-
국제상사중재에서 불완전중재판정부에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2009 .02
-
ICC중재에서 중재비용의 결정과 할당에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2007 .02
-
중재인 선정과 법원의 역할에 관한 연구
중재연구
2010 .01
-
중재인선정 절차에 있어서의 당사자자치와 법원의 개입
법학연구
2016 .12
-
A Comparative Study on the Qualifications and Challenge of Arbitrator in Commercial Arbitration
무역상무연구
2007 .12
-
남북상사중재에 있어 중재인선정방식에 관한 연구
중재연구
2008 .01
-
A Comparative Study of the Arbitrator Nominating Mechanisms : Bi-party Arbitration v. Multi-party Arbitration
법학연구
2006 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002851458