지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Among ChilJae of Koryo KukHak, six of them specialize in Confucianism, and entering one of the six is generally recorded as 'IpKukHakBo △△ Jae(入國學補△△齊)' or 'IpDaeHakYae △△ Jae(入大學隷△△齊)'. It means that the process of entering them is represented as becoming a member of each YuHakJae. Most of the monuments written in Koryo say the owners of the monuments entered YukJae by inscribing the title 'IpDaeHak(入大學)' or 'DaeHakSeng(大學生)'. It is believed that those Daehak which were frequently appeared on the monuments in the days of YeaJong to EuiJong changed their names from Kuk hak since the establishment of YukJae and YangHyunGo.
Of the 24 students of ChilJae in the days of YeaJong to EuiJong I examined, many who were identified were the sons of a noble family or the benefiter EumSuh(蔭敍). Although there is only a limited amount of data, this kind of record suggests that it is necessary to be careful in order not to misunderstand Koryo Kukhak as a useful pathway to upgrade the social position. Meanwhile, the status of the students before their enrollment is useful for understanding their intention. Prior to foundation of ChilJae, JangJa(張仔) who already entered Kukhak, men who already became part of the government through EumSuh, and JinSa(進士) who already passed GukjakamnSi(國子監試) all entered ChilJae in order to prepare for the civil service examination.
In this paper, I made clear that the previous idea that ChilJae is SangSa and ChilJaeSeng is SangSaSeng is controversial. Also, the fact that SangSaSeng were selected from YukJaeSeng clarifies the claim that ChilJae and Kukhak are irrelevant is false.
YukJaeSeng who specialize in Confucianism and SangSaSeng were selected in different ways. YukJaeSeng were selected through an exam, which was organized by KukHak, or through SeungBoSi(升補試). Meanwhile, SangSaSeng were the ones who got good grade in the exam called HengYaeSi(行藝試) or WalSiKaeGo(月試季考); they were named as the First SangSaSeng and the Second SangSaSeng. The First SangSaSeng were exempted from ChoJang(初場) and JoongJang(中場) and immediately applied for JongJang(終場). The Second SangSaSeng were exempted from ChoJang and applied for JoongJang. If YukJaeSeng were SangSaSeng and for that they received the benefit of taking the civil service examination, they would have inscribed such pride in their monuments. However, of the twenty monuments I examined, only two were identified as being owned to SangSaSeng. No evidence of SangSa is found in the monuments of rest of the YukJaeseng.
YeaJong established ChilJae in order to educate men to be proficient in both literary and military arts. After accepting Samsajae(三舍制), he selected SangSaSeng from YukJaeSeng and granted them the benefit of taking the civil service examination. In other words, YukJae is similar to NaeSa(內舍) of North Song(北宋)'s TaeHak(太學) which produced SangSaSeng. The system of SangSaSeng was accepted to appoint talented YukJaeSeng by the civil service examination in a fast and easy way.
Of the 24 students of ChilJae in the days of YeaJong to EuiJong I examined, many who were identified were the sons of a noble family or the benefiter EumSuh(蔭敍). Although there is only a limited amount of data, this kind of record suggests that it is necessary to be careful in order not to misunderstand Koryo Kukhak as a useful pathway to upgrade the social position. Meanwhile, the status of the students before their enrollment is useful for understanding their intention. Prior to foundation of ChilJae, JangJa(張仔) who already entered Kukhak, men who already became part of the government through EumSuh, and JinSa(進士) who already passed GukjakamnSi(國子監試) all entered ChilJae in order to prepare for the civil service examination.
In this paper, I made clear that the previous idea that ChilJae is SangSa and ChilJaeSeng is SangSaSeng is controversial. Also, the fact that SangSaSeng were selected from YukJaeSeng clarifies the claim that ChilJae and Kukhak are irrelevant is false.
YukJaeSeng who specialize in Confucianism and SangSaSeng were selected in different ways. YukJaeSeng were selected through an exam, which was organized by KukHak, or through SeungBoSi(升補試). Meanwhile, SangSaSeng were the ones who got good grade in the exam called HengYaeSi(行藝試) or WalSiKaeGo(月試季考); they were named as the First SangSaSeng and the Second SangSaSeng. The First SangSaSeng were exempted from ChoJang(初場) and JoongJang(中場) and immediately applied for JongJang(終場). The Second SangSaSeng were exempted from ChoJang and applied for JoongJang. If YukJaeSeng were SangSaSeng and for that they received the benefit of taking the civil service examination, they would have inscribed such pride in their monuments. However, of the twenty monuments I examined, only two were identified as being owned to SangSaSeng. No evidence of SangSa is found in the monuments of rest of the YukJaeseng.
YeaJong established ChilJae in order to educate men to be proficient in both literary and military arts. After accepting Samsajae(三舍制), he selected SangSaSeng from YukJaeSeng and granted them the benefit of taking the civil service examination. In other words, YukJae is similar to NaeSa(內舍) of North Song(北宋)'s TaeHak(太學) which produced SangSaSeng. The system of SangSaSeng was accepted to appoint talented YukJaeSeng by the civil service examination in a fast and easy way.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 7재생에 대한 기초적 검토
Ⅲ. 7재생의 학업평가와 科擧응시
Ⅳ. 맺는말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
인류의 철학, 역사, 문화의 원류인 『천부경(天符經)』에 함의된 홍익인간사상 연구
한국사상과 문화
2018 .01
-
老舍 小說과 基督敎
중국어문논역총간
2004 .07
-
조병로, 『韓國近世 驛制史硏究』(國學資料院, 2005)
사학연구
2007 .03
-
해외 한국학의 동향 : 서구중심적 시각과 민족주의를 넘어 지역학으로
국학연구
2003 .12
-
Ilbonshidae chaeil Chosŏnin minjok undong Yŏn’gu (A Research on the national movement of Koreans in Japan during the Japanese Colonial Period). By Chung Hye Kyung. Seoul: Kukhak Charyowon, 2001. 402 pp., 200,000 won (cloth)
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2002 .12
-
魚龍曼延 小考 : 佛敎와의 연관성을 중심으로
중국문화연구
2017 .02
-
文獻으로 본 韓國古代 金石文
문화사학
2004 .06
-
高麗
역사학보
1999 .09
-
《七眞年譜》의 紹介
도교문화연구
1993 .12
-
洛山寺 空中舍利塔碑를 통해 본 空中舍利塔의 건립문제 및 舍利莊嚴 고찰
문화사학
2007 .06
-
총론 - 고려전기 금석문을 통해 본 불교
역사와현실
2009 .03
-
[논문] 고려사회의 변화와 고려중기론
역사와현실
1999 .06
-
조선시대 과거제도와 시험문화의 고찰
한국사상과 문화
2007 .01
-
高麗時代의 國子監試에 대한 再檢討
역사학보
1984 .09
-
麗末鮮初의 科業敎育 : 書齋를 중심으로
역사학보
1975 .09
-
울진 봉평비의 ‘오(五)’자 논란에 대해
역사와현실
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002851593