지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The German Peasant War of 1525 can be regarded both as the last great medieval peasant revolt and as the first modern revolution. It offers also a good example for the comparative study of peasant society in general and social conflicts in agrarian societies in particular. Considering the potentiality of the comparative analysis with the analogous events in Chinese and Korean history this essay tries to sketch the main lines of interpretation of the Peasants' War and to discuss the two great thesis of it: early bourgeois revolution and the revolution of common man.
The Peasant War has been one of the most controversial themes since the formation of modern historical scholarship in Germany. The interpretation and characterization of the war itself were deeply interwoven with the political interests of every historians at their times. In the middle of 19th century came out the basic framework of main interpretations which more or less influenced continuing debates. In 1930s G. Franz published a great monograph on the Peasants' War which represented a classic interpretation in German academic historical scholarship. He argued that socio-economic grievance played a relative little role. and that the war was a political movement seeking to revive older customary rights of peasants.
After the second World War a Russian historian M. M. Smirin raised a new Marxist interpretation upon the solid research of source materials. Building on Engels' and Smirin's framework East German historians advanced the thesis of 'early bourgeois revolution'. This thesis gave an important impetus to the historians of West Germany for the revision of Peasant War. In 1970s there were some stimulating attempts to bridge the gap between political and socio-economic interpretations. The most important has been the work of Peter Blickle, whose main thesis is known as 'revolution of common man', Up to now, especially after the fall of Wall in 1989, Blickle's interpretation takes dominant position in the historiography of Peasant War.
The Peasant War has been one of the most controversial themes since the formation of modern historical scholarship in Germany. The interpretation and characterization of the war itself were deeply interwoven with the political interests of every historians at their times. In the middle of 19th century came out the basic framework of main interpretations which more or less influenced continuing debates. In 1930s G. Franz published a great monograph on the Peasants' War which represented a classic interpretation in German academic historical scholarship. He argued that socio-economic grievance played a relative little role. and that the war was a political movement seeking to revive older customary rights of peasants.
After the second World War a Russian historian M. M. Smirin raised a new Marxist interpretation upon the solid research of source materials. Building on Engels' and Smirin's framework East German historians advanced the thesis of 'early bourgeois revolution'. This thesis gave an important impetus to the historians of West Germany for the revision of Peasant War. In 1970s there were some stimulating attempts to bridge the gap between political and socio-economic interpretations. The most important has been the work of Peter Blickle, whose main thesis is known as 'revolution of common man', Up to now, especially after the fall of Wall in 1989, Blickle's interpretation takes dominant position in the historiography of Peasant War.
목차
Ⅰ. 序言
Ⅱ. 서건사적 槪況
Ⅲ. ‘農民戰爭’: 名稱과 해석의 系譜
Ⅳ. 主要 爭點과 남은 문제
Ⅴ. 結語
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Peasant
Korea Journal
1988 .09
-
Historical Characteristics of the Peasant War of 1894
Korea Journal
1994 .12
-
Tracing the Course of the Peasant War of 1894
Korea Journal
1994 .12
-
영국 농민반란과 동학농민혁명의 반봉건적 특성에 대한 비교 연구
동학연구
2006 .09
-
동독 역사학계의 “초기시민혁명으로서의 종교개혁과 농민전쟁” 테제 연구
신학논단
2016 .06
-
동학농민전쟁에 대한 역사교과서 서술 내용의 새로운 모색 : 동아시아적 시각과 ‘나눔과 배려’의 정신을 중심으로
역사와 담론
2012 .04
-
동학농민혁명 지역별 사례 연구의 성과와 전망
역사연구
2014 .12
-
신라하대 농민항쟁의 특징
International Journal of Korean History
2000 .12
-
정창렬의 동학농민전쟁 연구의 내용과 의의
한국인물사연구
2016 .09
-
동학농민혁명 기념사업의 역사적 전개와 과제
역사연구
2015 .06
-
The Connection of the Sino-Japanese War and the Peasant War of 1894
Korea Journal
1994 .12
-
동학농민전쟁과 미술 : 한국 현대 역사화의 도도한 흐름을 일구다
역사연구
2015 .06
-
The Problem of Identity among Peasant Women in Korea
Korea Journal
1998 .06
-
한국 농민운동의 동향과 실태 연구
성곡논총
1989 .08
-
1930년대 농촌소설의 농민의식 반영 양상 : 김유정론
비평문학
2006 .12
-
The Socioeconomic Background and the Growth of the New Social Forces of the 1894 Peasant War
Korea Journal
1994 .12
-
19세기 原州지역의 환곡문제와 농민항쟁
지방사와 지방문화
2010 .11
-
동학농민혁명 기념사업의 사회성과 기념공간 연구
지방사와 지방문화
2007 .05
-
한국 농민시 연구 서설
국어국문학
1990 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002859857