지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study analyzed the industrial production and labor effect of the Korea-US FTA and Korea-China FTA based on expert opinion survey. The Fuzzy Decision-Making Method was primarily used in the opinion survey.
There were three findings. First, the study showed that in the case of the Korea-US FTA, Korean industries advantageous in the aspect of industrial production included automobile, auto parts, textile and clothing while the service industries such as legal, accounting, medical care, telecom, finance and education were found to be at a disadvantage. In particular, industries like pharmaceuticals, agriculture, forestry & fishery and livestock were found to be at a huge disadvantage.
Second, if a Korea-China FTA is concluded, Korea will have the upper hand in the automobile, auto parts, and textile and clothing industries in terms of industrial production. However, there exists an underlying possibility that production increase may not lead to effective job creation as productions facilities may relocate to China with relatively lower labor cost. Industries found to be in a weaker position based on the conclusion of a Korea-China FTA were agriculture, forestry & fishery, mining, wooden furniture and processed foods, and such industries were found unlikely to see creation of jobs.
Third, when comparing the FTA with the US and China, there are slightly more positives in terms of industrial production in the latter case.
If comparing the average fuzzy score of the manufacturing industry, the outcome of a Korea-China FTA is much larger than the Korea-US FTA. However, based on the score for certainty in judgment, a FTA between Korea and China scored lower which shows the lack of information of interested parties regarding the conclusion of a Korea-China FTA.
There were three findings. First, the study showed that in the case of the Korea-US FTA, Korean industries advantageous in the aspect of industrial production included automobile, auto parts, textile and clothing while the service industries such as legal, accounting, medical care, telecom, finance and education were found to be at a disadvantage. In particular, industries like pharmaceuticals, agriculture, forestry & fishery and livestock were found to be at a huge disadvantage.
Second, if a Korea-China FTA is concluded, Korea will have the upper hand in the automobile, auto parts, and textile and clothing industries in terms of industrial production. However, there exists an underlying possibility that production increase may not lead to effective job creation as productions facilities may relocate to China with relatively lower labor cost. Industries found to be in a weaker position based on the conclusion of a Korea-China FTA were agriculture, forestry & fishery, mining, wooden furniture and processed foods, and such industries were found unlikely to see creation of jobs.
Third, when comparing the FTA with the US and China, there are slightly more positives in terms of industrial production in the latter case.
If comparing the average fuzzy score of the manufacturing industry, the outcome of a Korea-China FTA is much larger than the Korea-US FTA. However, based on the score for certainty in judgment, a FTA between Korea and China scored lower which shows the lack of information of interested parties regarding the conclusion of a Korea-China FTA.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. Fuzzy 의사결정 방법론
Ⅲ. 실태조사
Ⅳ. 분석 결과
Ⅴ. 결론 및 시사점
참고문헌
Abstract
부록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
FTAs and China
인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회
2006 .05
-
China-Korea Trade and Investment Development and Free Trade Area(FTA) Prospects
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2003 .10
-
한중 FTA의 경제적 효과와 양국의 FTA 추진전략 비교
관세학회지
2011 .02
-
한·미 FTA 바로 알기 2006
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2006 .05
-
순차적 FTA: 한국의 중국 및 일본과의 FTA
한국경제연구
2010 .12
-
The Effect of FTA's Results on China Distribution Company
유통과학연구
2017 .01
-
한·중 FTA 및 한·미 FTA의 환경조항 비교
무역상무연구
2016 .02
-
한 · 중 FTA 체결의 경제적 효과에 관한 연구
기업과혁신연구
2006 .12
-
A CGE Analysis of Free Trade Agreements among China, Japan, and Korea
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2008 .12
-
The China-Korea FTA : The Investment Issue
국제경제법연구
2011 .05
-
한-중 FTA의 필요성과 추진정책 제언
한국동북아논총
2008 .09
-
FTA 시장개방의 노동시장 영향 분석
관세학회지
2007 .02
-
한국 FTA정책의 비판적 검토
시민과세계
2006 .07
-
FTA 정보시스템 활용능력과 FTA활용의사와의 관계 분석
전자무역연구
2015 .01
-
한국의 FTA 체결전략 상 농수산물부문의 대응방안에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2015 .04
-
한-미 FTA와 한-중 FTA 전·후 한국의 무역경쟁력 비교 및 결정요인 분석
통상정보연구
2018 .12
-
한․중 FTA에 따른 충남 주력산업의대응방안
전문경영인연구
2015 .01
-
FTA 체결국 제품의 구매의도 결정요인
무역연구
2015 .01
-
Business Use of FTAs in Korea
인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회
2010 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002393035