지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2001.10
- 수록면
- 351 - 388 (38page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is said that regional and global liberalization initiatives have been mutually reinforcing since the EC market was created in the late 1950s. Is it true? They say that the fears of some observers that regionalism would derail globalism have been overcome to date. Is it really true?
Anyway, on account of the worldwide trend of this bloc economy which is increasingly deepening recently, the author is afraid that it will seriously threaten the export market of this country. Accordingly, Korea, which is forced to last its economic growth through export, is still under the situation which she does not enter into merely anyone of Free Trade Area(FTA) in the world and this situation results in facing with a crisis which may be degraded into the status of a "country of limited scope".
Like this, since the cold war's collapse, how Korea goes ahead towards the 21 century under the cruel actualities which the world order led by the supper economy is now being reorganized?
In order to survive in the midst of great upheaval of the 21. century Korea should exactly understand the present flow of the World and quickly cope with it.
The author in this paper emphasizes that whether the flow of the world runs into such "multilateralism" as WTO or such "regionalism" as EU/NAFTA, Korea should inevitably reborn into an attractive, valuable and creditable country as a partner in view of the position of foreign country.
In order to make Korea such a country, as a Korea's middle-long term FTA program strategies, the author in this paper especially lay a stress upon the following two strategies.
The first basic strategy is a) Korea should choose FTA type among several types of economic integration, b) Korea should promote such multi-track race as multilateralism (WTO), regionalism(Korea-Chile FTA, NEA FTA, etc.), and bilateralism(Korea-US investment agreement, Korea-Japan investment agreement etc.) with all her might, c) Korea should realize the conclusion of the universal and reasonable bilateral FTA, d) Korea should enhance the role as a adjustor in the multilateral FTA conclusion, e) Korea should conclude the FTA to be made efficient use of position as a stronghold of a region bloc, and f) Korea should exist as a Hub Nation in Asian region.
The second concrete strategy is a) first of all, Korea should conclude FTA with' Chile within this year, b) Korea should establish industrial community among Korea, Japan, and China(steel, energy, logistics, semi-conductor etc.) within 2003, c) Korea should conclude KJC FTA within 2005, and d) Korea should conclude NEA FTA within 2010.
Anyway, on account of the worldwide trend of this bloc economy which is increasingly deepening recently, the author is afraid that it will seriously threaten the export market of this country. Accordingly, Korea, which is forced to last its economic growth through export, is still under the situation which she does not enter into merely anyone of Free Trade Area(FTA) in the world and this situation results in facing with a crisis which may be degraded into the status of a "country of limited scope".
Like this, since the cold war's collapse, how Korea goes ahead towards the 21 century under the cruel actualities which the world order led by the supper economy is now being reorganized?
In order to survive in the midst of great upheaval of the 21. century Korea should exactly understand the present flow of the World and quickly cope with it.
The author in this paper emphasizes that whether the flow of the world runs into such "multilateralism" as WTO or such "regionalism" as EU/NAFTA, Korea should inevitably reborn into an attractive, valuable and creditable country as a partner in view of the position of foreign country.
In order to make Korea such a country, as a Korea's middle-long term FTA program strategies, the author in this paper especially lay a stress upon the following two strategies.
The first basic strategy is a) Korea should choose FTA type among several types of economic integration, b) Korea should promote such multi-track race as multilateralism (WTO), regionalism(Korea-Chile FTA, NEA FTA, etc.), and bilateralism(Korea-US investment agreement, Korea-Japan investment agreement etc.) with all her might, c) Korea should realize the conclusion of the universal and reasonable bilateral FTA, d) Korea should enhance the role as a adjustor in the multilateral FTA conclusion, e) Korea should conclude the FTA to be made efficient use of position as a stronghold of a region bloc, and f) Korea should exist as a Hub Nation in Asian region.
The second concrete strategy is a) first of all, Korea should conclude FTA with' Chile within this year, b) Korea should establish industrial community among Korea, Japan, and China(steel, energy, logistics, semi-conductor etc.) within 2003, c) Korea should conclude KJC FTA within 2005, and d) Korea should conclude NEA FTA within 2010.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 세계 경제블록 현황과 전망
Ⅲ. 탈냉전 이후 세계 주요국의 21세기 전략
Ⅳ. 한국의 자유무역협정 추진 현황
Ⅴ. 한국의 중장기 자유무역협정 추진 전략
Ⅵ. 요약과 결론
참고 문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국의 FTA정책에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2003 .09
-
The Effect of FTA's Results on China Distribution Company
유통과학연구
2017 .01
-
한국 수출산업의 대칠레 경쟁력 변화에 관한 연구: 한․칠레 FTA 체결 전후 비교를 중심으로
기업경영연구
2013 .01
-
한국 FTA정책의 비판적 검토
시민과세계
2006 .07
-
Business Use of FTAs in Korea
인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회
2010 .07
-
한중 FTA의 경제적 효과와 양국의 FTA 추진전략 비교
관세학회지
2011 .02
-
한·중 FTA 및 한·미 FTA의 환경조항 비교
무역상무연구
2016 .02
-
한-중 FTA의 필요성과 추진정책 제언
한국동북아논총
2008 .09
-
이질적 목적과 자유무역협정(FTA): 한-인도 CEPA 및 한-페루 FTA에서 FTA 정책과 전략의 차이
분쟁해결연구
2012 .01
-
순차적 FTA: 한국의 중국 및 일본과의 FTA
한국경제연구
2010 .12
-
한·미 FTA 바로 알기 2006
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2006 .05
-
FTA 발효 이후 우리나라 농산물 교역의 영향과 평가 : 한·칠레 FTA 협정을 중심으로
무역학회지
2013 .04
-
한ㆍ중ㆍ일의 대 ASEAN FTA협정 분석 : 철강산업을 중심으로
관세학회지
2007 .08
-
East Asian Regionalism and South Korea's FTA Strategy
국제정치논총
2004 .12
-
China-Korea Trade and Investment Development and Free Trade Area(FTA) Prospects
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2003 .10
-
A CGE Analysis of Free Trade Agreements among China, Japan, and Korea
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2008 .12
-
한ㆍ미 FTA 체결과 우리나라 중소기업의 대응방안
관세학회지
2012 .02
-
일본의 FTA정책과 경제적 효과
통상정보연구
2006 .06
-
한국의 FTA 체결전략 상 농수산물부문의 대응방안에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2015 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002417841