메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김경석 (중앙대학교)
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 企業法硏究 第24卷 第2號
발행연도
2010.6
수록면
81 - 118 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is a precious information to stakeholders and investors whether the internal control system is set up and functions effectively. A manager has a responsibility to build and operate the system and report the status of system installation and operation. And it is required for the credibility of the information that one who has no interest from the corporation evaluates
In Korea, the internal control system is set up, but there are some issues to be improved on terms, eligibility, the protection system for whistle blowers, manager's report, and the opinion announcement of it. Here are basic directions of correction for those issues
As for terms, first, the internal accounting administering system of Act on external audit of stock companies should be regarded as the internal control for the financial report
Second, the objects of the internal accounting administering system should be expanded from listed companies with the total asset of over 100 billion to all the listed
Third, the object of whistle blowers' report and notification should be expanded and the protection of them should be strengthened to prevent the unfair treatments.
Last, a CEO has to be in charge of the evaluation of how effective the internal accounting administering system is and the auditor's expression of pinion for CEO's report is good enough as it is currently.
However, there are some different opinions that the auditor's expression of opinion should be the same level to the cases in the US and Japan. And the level required by the SOXlaw is required for the case of Koreancorps that are listed in the US. Thus, with reference to the Japanese results in 2009.
1. The policy and procedure of settlement, financial report process should be dealt with attention, 2. The personnel with expertise should be procured and deployed 3. The focus should be put on the parts of high risk and so the unnecessary expense should be minimized. Also, a government and related organizations should have interest in the announcement of guidelines and set-up of consultation window.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 미국의 내부통제보고제도
Ⅲ. 일본의 내부통제보고제도
Ⅳ. 우리나라의 내부통제보고제도
Ⅴ. 결론
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (1)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-366-002432222