지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.3
- 수록면
- 27 - 66 (40page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Shakespeare opens every act of his Henry the Fifth with chorus. This is quite unusual in his whole corpus, except Pericles. The chorus in Henry the Fifth does not merely function as a commentator on the dramatic action, but also narrates the main historical events of the play. However, in its narration and reading of main dramatic events, it is very selective in order to foreground Henry's heroic achievements as a warlord. The chorus emphasizes its limit of re-presentation of Henry's heroism on the stage. By admitting the physical insufficiency of the stage to contain the epic grandeur of a history play, the chorus appeals to the audience's sympathetic imagination to make up its limits. The heroic sublime is a Shakespearean strategy to make his audience participate in the critical appreciation of English historical events. Shakespeare's stage is a cauldron into which he puts 'the materials of English chronicles and historical narratives and reshuffles them to his dramatic plot. This Shakespearean re-forming of English history is analogous to the audience's creative and critical re-experience of their past.
The chorus in the play incessantly tries to set up Henry as the national hero similar to William the Conqueror. In this sense the chorus stands in for the royalist view of English history. However, the discrepancy between the chorus's narration and dramatic action on the stage shows its partiality and even its distortion of historical significance. The traditional interpretation of the chorus's function was to equate it with Shakespeare the historian in his conservative support of the Tudor myth. This reading is proved wrong in the paper. The chorus ironically cancels and self-consumes its heroic image of Henry by appealing directly to the audience's imagination. The chorus always frustrates the expectations of the tantalized audience: the latter rather experiences painful bodily presence and national disunity disrupting a single and unified nation proclaimed by the chorus. The selective partiality of the chorus in the narration is implicitly juxtaposed with the historiography as a narrative emplotment. The audience experiences history as a story on the stage. Shakespeare's re-presentation of history is both re-forming and re-reading of it at once. He is sceptical and subversive of the Tudor myth, since he puts the whole English history of his dramatization in a hermeneutical circle which makes it refract and reflect itself.
The chorus in the play incessantly tries to set up Henry as the national hero similar to William the Conqueror. In this sense the chorus stands in for the royalist view of English history. However, the discrepancy between the chorus's narration and dramatic action on the stage shows its partiality and even its distortion of historical significance. The traditional interpretation of the chorus's function was to equate it with Shakespeare the historian in his conservative support of the Tudor myth. This reading is proved wrong in the paper. The chorus ironically cancels and self-consumes its heroic image of Henry by appealing directly to the audience's imagination. The chorus always frustrates the expectations of the tantalized audience: the latter rather experiences painful bodily presence and national disunity disrupting a single and unified nation proclaimed by the chorus. The selective partiality of the chorus in the narration is implicitly juxtaposed with the historiography as a narrative emplotment. The audience experiences history as a story on the stage. Shakespeare's re-presentation of history is both re-forming and re-reading of it at once. He is sceptical and subversive of the Tudor myth, since he puts the whole English history of his dramatization in a hermeneutical circle which makes it refract and reflect itself.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
셰익스피어 극에서 본 코러스의 기능과 역할 : 〈페리클레스〉와 〈헨리 5세〉를 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
2001 .03
-
『헨리 5세』: 대영제국 비전의 투영과 비판
신영어영문학
2011 .11
-
전쟁드라마 『헨리 5세』에 나타난 계층갈등과 이데올로기의 균열
고전 르네상스 영문학
2012 .01
-
로렌스 올리비에와 케네스 브라나의 『헨리 5세』에 나타난 메타시네마적 요소: 메타드라마에서 메타시네마로
영어영문학연구
2008 .01
-
『헨리 5세』 - 마키아벨리스트 헨리의 성공과 실패
Shakespeare Review
2000 .06
-
노랫소리운동에 관한 일고찰 : ‘국민개창운동’과 ‘노랫소리운동’, 그리고 대중의 수용을 중심으로
일본연구
2014 .02
-
관객반응을 위한 현대 극작가의 예술적 의식과 기법
현대영미드라마
2000 .04
-
Henry Ⅴ : Henry와 극의 구조
Shakespeare Review
1993 .06
-
1, 2, 3 Henry Ⅵ의 구성
Shakespeare Review
1987 .08
-
Strong Witches and Tragic Chorus : Women in the Shakespeare’s Henry VI Trilogy and Richard III
Shakespeare Review
2018 .12
-
Shakespeare's Stage and Audience
Shakespeare Review
1987 .08
-
Henry of Monmouth와 배역 - Henry Ⅳ 제1부와 제2부, Henry Ⅴ에 대한 재고
Shakespeare Review
1995 .12
-
그리스의 음악정신과 비극의 코러스에 관한 연구
외국문학연구
2018 .02
-
“All is True”: Truth, History and Historiography in Henry VIII of Shakespeare and Fletcher
고전 르네상스 영문학
2010 .01
-
Henry James 소설에 나타난 ‘연극적’ 기법
인문학연구
2005 .12
-
Ⅳ Henry Ⅳ의 1부와 2부 : 해설
Shakespeare Review
1988 .10
-
＂플롯은 세워졌다＂: 『헨리 6세』제 1부의 구조
고전 르네상스 영문학
2008 .01
-
『헨리 5세』와 『리어 왕』에서 살펴본 주변부에 대한 셰익스피어의 극적 이용
Shakespeare Review
2020 .06
-
Shakespeare`s Dramatic Design
영어영문학
2005 .12
-
구술전통과 고전극의 서사적 유대
온지논총
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『헨리 5세』: 대영제국 비전의 투영과 비판
김문규
신영어영문학
2011
.11
『날개 돋친 뱀』에서 나타난 D. H. 로렌스의 성적 욕망의 재현
오은영
외국문학연구
2006
.11
『헨리 5세』 - 마키아벨리스트 헨리의 성공과 실패
임혜리
Shakespeare Review
2000
.06
Shakespeare's Henry Ⅳ as a Representation of History
Young Cho Lee
Shakespeare Review
2006
.09
셰익스피어의 바다와 극적 구조 : 『페리클레스』를 중심으로
박우수
Shakespeare Review
2007
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-002476269