메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
신주백 (연세대학교)
저널정보
한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제149호
발행연도
2010.6
수록면
353 - 376 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Until Kang Man'gil's publication of a book entitled, "The National Revolutionary Party of Korea and the United Front(朝鮮民族革命黨과 統一戰線)" (Hwap'y?ngsa 和平社, 1991), the history of national movements in Korea was regarded as having centered on the nationalist movement associated with the Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea and the related struggle for independence. Meanwhile, in North Korea, the contribution of all national movements other than that of the Kim Ils?ng (金日成)-led anti-Japanese armed struggle were, in accordance with the tenets of the Chuch'e Ideology(主體思想), expunged from history books. In Japan, the major focus was on the fact that the 1920s saw the socialist camp replace thenationalist forces as the mainstream movement.
However, Kang Man'gil sought to reorganize the history of the national movement around the United Front, a group within which no specific party or social class dominated or exercised a hegemonic position. Kang regarded this task as the main role of historical studies, namely building a cornerstone based upon which the division of Korea could be overcome. His study on the National Revolutionary Party of Korea (朝鮮民族革命黨) was the first of his works which reflected his unique consciousness of issues. Therefore, Kang's historical study, which identifies the history of the national movement as a part of the movement to establish a united nation state, can be regarded as having been embedded with a strong sense of contemporariness.
The united front policy of the National Revolutionary Party of Korea was different from that adopted by those who implemented the reconstruction of the Communist Party of Korea (朝鮮共産黨) as well as the guerilla units who engaged in armed struggles in Manchuria. Above all, the National Revolutionary Party of Korea did not recognize the notion of the hegemony of the proletariat, or the leadership of the Communist Party of Korea. Although changeswere made to the united front policy of the socialists during the mid-1930s, these fundamental differences were never narrowed down.
Nevertheless, as the war gradually expanded, efforts were made to establish an organization which could overcome these differences and implement communal actions. In effect, a political situation was created in which it became impossible for either side to advocate an anti-Communist or anti-nationalist line. This can be understood as the main reasoning behind the National Revolutionary Party of Korea's decision to join the Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea. In addition, the fact that such a union only successfully took place in that area can be explained by the ideological affinity that existed between Kim Ku's(金九) group and the National Revolutionary Party of Korea, both of which shared a belief in the notion of 'socialist nationalism'(社會主義的 民族主義).

목차

Ⅰ. 민족운동사에 대한 계통적인 이해체계들
Ⅱ. ‘분단극복 역사학‘의 새로운 비틀기
Ⅲ. 통일전선운동의 구체적 비교와 관내지역 민족운동의 특징
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉

참고문헌 (41)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-003101038