메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
한병영 (인천대학교)
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 企業法硏究 第24卷 第3號
발행연도
2010.9
수록면
353 - 392 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to understand general investor as the party applicable to financial consumer over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives to recognize the justification for protection and develop the system by finding the legal principle for protection in a way of drafting the effective protection plan. Most of its content is the clearing of existing legal principles but new attempt is made to quote or apply the legal principle on consumer protection on the manufactured products.
For legal principles to be applied to the OTC derivatives, the principles of contract law would be more likely to apply rather than those of securities laws since the OTC derivatives have formed with the structure of entering into contract on the one-on-one basis, not being used as in the way of securities. The approach is made to protect the consumers of OTC derivatives with the legal principles of civil law in invalidity, error, fraud, termination and the like. In light of the complexity of the OTC derivative structure, financial consumers easily enter into the contract under error, fraud or others with the failure to carry out the obligation of notification and there could be an issue of terminating the contract following the continuance of the contract.
In the event that violations of due diligence obligation, fiduciary duty, protection of customer's interest, obligation to describe, or suitability rule as well as illegal trans-actions would constitute as torts to hold financial consumers as liable for damage compensation, the approach is made to the conversion method of product liability or burden of proof. Lastly, the contract used in the OTC transaction while approaching by applying the consumer protection principle would be considered as an article to apply the guaranteed right of consumers under the article regulation laws to financial consumers as reasonable. The class action system also would need to be introduced for the OTC derivatives as well as the need to introduce the right to cool off or voluntary cancellation right as well as the recall system, and even if the product liability cannot be applied to consumers of OTC derivatives directly, the principle may be used to review with respect to reflecting the same on the legislation.

목차

Ⅰ. 序言
Ⅱ. 장외파생상품거래에 대한 규제의 필요성
Ⅲ. 장외파생상품거래에 있어서 금융소비자 보호의 체계
Ⅳ. 결론
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (38)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-366-003692402