지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The pattern of existing research on the purpose of [Han-Joong-Rok(한중록)] falls into two broad tendencies. One tends to promote the idea that Hyekyeong Goong attributed the cause of ‘Imohwabeon’ to psychological conflicts between Y?ngjo and Prince Sado. the other tends to put an emphasis on Hyekyeong Goong’s intention to make excuse for what Hong-Bonghan, Hong-Inhan and Hong- Nakim did, with an aim to save her family's honor. However, a close examination of the political situation at that time suggests that neither of the two positions can be seen as a full picture of what the author of [Han-Joong-Rok(한중록)] attempted to achieve.
[Han-Joong-Rok(한중록)] can be divided into two categories on the basis of its adherence to ‘Ch?ngjo’s Imoh-Euli(壬午義理)’. [Han-Joong-Man-Rok(閑中漫錄)] and [Eub-Hyeol-Rok(泣血錄)] that are written in Year Nineteen of Ch?ngjo and in Year Two of Soonjo respectively. It is until Year Two of Soonjo that Hyekyeong-Goong addressed to her family members the importance of keeping their head low, or attempted to move beyond pleading the cause of her family members’ conduct, defining her stand as an advocate of ‘Ch?ngjo’s Imoh-Euli(壬午義理)’.
However, there is a sign that the way in which the issue of ‘Imohwabeon’ is addressed in ‘Han-Joong-Rok’ has changed in Year Five of Soonjo; that is, the importance of bringing honor back to Hong family came to the fore. Both [Han-Joong-Rok(恨中錄)] and [Byeong-In-Choo-Rok(丙寅追錄)] that are written in Year Five and Six of Soonjo respectively suggested a grand compromise between officials, or even attempted to seek retribution against ‘Byeokpa(僻派)’, showing a disapproval of ‘Ch?ngjo’s Imoh-Euli(壬午義理)’.
Therefore, it is important for us not to place an exclusive emphasis on [Han-Joong-Rok(恨中錄)] as the author’s intension of writing [Han-Joong-Rok(한중록)] continued to adjust itself to changes in political situation between later period of Ch?ngjo and the early reign of Soonjo.
[Han-Joong-Rok(한중록)] can be divided into two categories on the basis of its adherence to ‘Ch?ngjo’s Imoh-Euli(壬午義理)’. [Han-Joong-Man-Rok(閑中漫錄)] and [Eub-Hyeol-Rok(泣血錄)] that are written in Year Nineteen of Ch?ngjo and in Year Two of Soonjo respectively. It is until Year Two of Soonjo that Hyekyeong-Goong addressed to her family members the importance of keeping their head low, or attempted to move beyond pleading the cause of her family members’ conduct, defining her stand as an advocate of ‘Ch?ngjo’s Imoh-Euli(壬午義理)’.
However, there is a sign that the way in which the issue of ‘Imohwabeon’ is addressed in ‘Han-Joong-Rok’ has changed in Year Five of Soonjo; that is, the importance of bringing honor back to Hong family came to the fore. Both [Han-Joong-Rok(恨中錄)] and [Byeong-In-Choo-Rok(丙寅追錄)] that are written in Year Five and Six of Soonjo respectively suggested a grand compromise between officials, or even attempted to seek retribution against ‘Byeokpa(僻派)’, showing a disapproval of ‘Ch?ngjo’s Imoh-Euli(壬午義理)’.
Therefore, it is important for us not to place an exclusive emphasis on [Han-Joong-Rok(恨中錄)] as the author’s intension of writing [Han-Joong-Rok(한중록)] continued to adjust itself to changes in political situation between later period of Ch?ngjo and the early reign of Soonjo.
목차
1. 서언
2. 『한중록』 연구의 동향과 문제제기
3. 庚申換局 전후의 정국 동향과 「閑中漫錄」ㆍ「泣血錄」
4. 순조 親政 이후의 정국 동향과 「恨中錄」ㆍ「丙寅追錄」
5. 결어
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 김용숙 / 1987 / 閑中錄硏究 / 정음사 : 237 ~ 276
2. [단행본] - 최봉영 / 1992 / 壬午禍變과 英祖末·正祖初의 政治勢力 in: 朝鮮後期 黨爭의 綜合的 檢討 / 한국정신문화연구원
3. [단행본] - 박광용 / 1998 / 혜경궁 홍씨와 한중록 in: 영조와 정조의 나라 / 푸른역사
4. [단행본] - 이은순 / 1988 / 사도세자의 정치적 생애와 時僻의 분립 in: 조선후기 당쟁사 연구 / 일조각 : 105 ~ 124
5. [단행본] - 유봉학 / 2001 / 정조대왕의 꿈 / 신구문화사 : 40 ~ 57
2. [단행본] - 최봉영 / 1992 / 壬午禍變과 英祖末·正祖初의 政治勢力 in: 朝鮮後期 黨爭의 綜合的 檢討 / 한국정신문화연구원
3. [단행본] - 박광용 / 1998 / 혜경궁 홍씨와 한중록 in: 영조와 정조의 나라 / 푸른역사
4. [단행본] - 이은순 / 1988 / 사도세자의 정치적 생애와 時僻의 분립 in: 조선후기 당쟁사 연구 / 일조각 : 105 ~ 124
5. [단행본] - 유봉학 / 2001 / 정조대왕의 꿈 / 신구문화사 : 40 ~ 57
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
궁중어의 아름다움-[한중록]을 중심으로-
한글
1994 .12
-
The Definitions of Individuality and ROK Kungmin (國民) in the Political Philosophy of the Incipient Republic of Korea
International Journal of Korean History
2011 .02
-
정조대 초반의 蕩平 義理와 忠逆論
태동고전연구
2009 .01
-
Han and Its New Use
Korea Journal
1989 .08
-
Hypotheses Concerning ROK Policy toward North Korea
Korea Journal
1971 .11
-
[왜?] 혜경궁 홍씨는 왜『한중록』을 지었는가?
내일을 여는 역사
2000 .10
-
한국의 세계보건기구(WHO) 가입과정과 1950년대의 사업성과
의사학
2014 .04
-
역사와 민중 TV사극에 문제 있다 -한중록을 중심으로
역사비평
1989 .08
-
North Korea between China, Japan and the ROK, 2012–2016
Korea Journal
2018 .09
-
안중근 의거에 대한 국외 한인사회의 인식과 반응
한국독립운동사연구
2007 .06
-
아베 정권의 우경화와 동북아 안보 향배 : 집단적 자위권 추진과 대응방향을 중심으로
일본문화연구
2014 .07
-
설립 초기 대한민국의 북한 실지화(失地化)와 조선민주주의인민공화국 타자화(他者化) (1948.8~1950.6)
사학연구
2007 .12
-
조선시대 정원문화로 읽는 <안빙몽유록>
韓國古典硏究
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
[왜?] 혜경궁 홍씨는 왜『한중록』을 지었는가?
조성산
내일을 여는 역사
2000
.10
영조대 중반의 정국과 '임오화변' - 임오화변(사도세자 폐사사건)의 발생원인에 대한 재검토를 중심으로 -
김성윤
역사와경계
2002
.06
사도세자(思悼世子)의 비극(悲劇)과 그 정신분석학적(精神分析學的) 고찰(考察) -'한중록' 연구(硏究)-
김용숙
국어국문학
1958
.06
『한중록』과 『붉은 왕세자빈』에 나타난 문화횡단성 연구 : 사도세자의 죽음을 중심으로 한 심층심리학적 고찰
손태수
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2008
.03
彙報 외
편집부
역사교육
2015
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-374-003694031