지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The coloniality of the Market Regulation set by Chosun Government-General is represented by its control over the life markets, which were essential to the everyday life of Chosun people, with a proxy of the police that acted in the name of public peace and order. But the more fundamental issue was that it defined the Jangsi(場市) as a retrogressive institution and further the object of rationalization to get rid of eventually. As a result. it used the Jangsi as a means of rule for policy promotion based on the minimal regulations for sanitation and taxation. It never set up and carried out policies to consider the characteristics of the Jangsi system and maintained an approach of no interest and no accountability towards any conflicts over the Jangsi among the citizens.
The Market Regulation remained effective after Korea took back its independence and finally abolished right after 5ㆍ16 Incident. after which the "revolutionary government" announced a new Market Act. Enacted in 1961, the Market Act followed the base of the Market Regulation in almost every aspect. Although it removed the provisions that endowed the police with the supervision and control authority and thus no longer enforced the old provisions that saw the life markets as the object of the government's direct and oppressive control, it inherited the perception of the old colonial government that the Jangsi would gradually disappear and should be modernized from above. Such a viewpoint gave birth to the direct "argument to abolish the Jangsi" as its number continued to grow in the 1970s. There were also arguments for the rationalization and modernization of distribution.
The Market Act followed the Market Regulation and the Central Wholesale Market Act was enacted and executed, which implies that the decolonialization of market acts manifested itself in the continuance of coloniality or the completion of modern colonial times. Although it's restricted to market acts, it's confirmed that the decolonialization process after Korea took back its independence was bound to the perception framework and structure of modern colonial times formulated by the colonial authorities and that the matter of modern colonial times was reproduced a matter of the present instead of the past.
The Market Regulation remained effective after Korea took back its independence and finally abolished right after 5ㆍ16 Incident. after which the "revolutionary government" announced a new Market Act. Enacted in 1961, the Market Act followed the base of the Market Regulation in almost every aspect. Although it removed the provisions that endowed the police with the supervision and control authority and thus no longer enforced the old provisions that saw the life markets as the object of the government's direct and oppressive control, it inherited the perception of the old colonial government that the Jangsi would gradually disappear and should be modernized from above. Such a viewpoint gave birth to the direct "argument to abolish the Jangsi" as its number continued to grow in the 1970s. There were also arguments for the rationalization and modernization of distribution.
The Market Act followed the Market Regulation and the Central Wholesale Market Act was enacted and executed, which implies that the decolonialization of market acts manifested itself in the continuance of coloniality or the completion of modern colonial times. Although it's restricted to market acts, it's confirmed that the decolonialization process after Korea took back its independence was bound to the perception framework and structure of modern colonial times formulated by the colonial authorities and that the matter of modern colonial times was reproduced a matter of the present instead of the past.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 조선총독부 「시장규칙」과 일본의 시장 관계 법령
3. 1950년대 중앙도매시장 및 가축시장 관련 법령의 제정
4. 1961년 「시장법」제정과 농촌 장시
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
주체성의 관점에서 본 일제시기 장시의 갈등 - 허영란, 『일제시기 장시 연구: 5일장의 변동과 지역주민』(2009, 역사비평사) -
역사와현실
2009 .09
-
朝鮮後期~日帝時代 內浦地域의 形成과 變化
지방사와 지방문화
2004 .11
-
조선후기 錦江水運과 浦口市場圈
역사와 담론
2006 .04
-
조선총독부의 오일장에 대한 통제 및 활용과 그 한계 : 일제 식민통치에 대한 사회적 제약의 구체적 검토
사학연구
2006 .06
-
18세기후반~20세기전반 기장지역의 시장권
지방사와 지방문화
2010 .05
-
전통시장의 쇠락과정, 대응양상, 그리고 미래 : 전주 남부시장의 민족지적 사례
비교문화연구
2015 .01
-
한일 전통시장정책의 전개과정에 관한 고찰 - 사회적경제의 관점에서 -
일어일문학
2019 .08
-
The Market in Korea : A Historical Survey
Korea Journal
1989 .06
-
농촌 정기시장의 사회ㆍ문화적 의미 : 상주지역의 사례를 중심으로
지방사와 지방문화
2005 .05
-
시각예술의 경제적 의미 및 한국 미술시장의 수요분석
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2002 .12
-
일제하 시장제도 변화와 마산어시장
역사민속학
2006 .06
-
북한의 시장과 시장경제 - 수령을 대체한 화폐 -
담론201
2007 .01
-
18~19세기 김해 지역의 상품 유통권과 유통 물품
한국민족문화
2020 .02
-
중국 중고자동차시장의 유통활성화정책에 따른 제도적 장벽과 대응방안연구
중국학
2020 .01
-
러시아 미술시장의 현주소와 전망: 구매 경향과 컬렉션 목록을 중심으로
슬라브학보
2019 .12
-
隋唐 長安城의 市場風景 : 胡漢文化의 交流와 統合의 現場
역사교육
2002 .12
-
Korea`s Securities Market
Korea Journal
1966 .04
-
16世紀 場市의 成立과 그 基盤
한국사연구
1987 .06
-
淸中期 전국시장과 지역경제
역사와 세계
2015 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-004315367