메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
손명곤 (경남대학교)
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아 문화연구 동북아 문화연구 제26집
발행연도
2011.3
수록면
601 - 612 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Dispute over Hesychasm mainly between st. Gregory Palamas and Barlaam the Calabrian in the middle of 14th century has an important meanning in the history of Eastern Orthodox Church, because it served as a momentun to authorize Hesychasm, the ancient practice of mental prayer.
In the Dispute Gregory Palamas oriented his entire polemic against Barlaam the Calabrian on the issue of the 'Hellenic wisdom' which he considers to be the main source of Barlaam’s errors. Barlaam's views - that we cannot really know Who the Holy Spirit is exactly, that the light of the Transfiguration is something which is created and can be undone, that the hesychastic way of life (i.e. the purification of the heart and the unceasing noetic prayer) is not essential - are views which express a supra-scholastic and, subsequently, a secularised point of view of theology.
St. Gregory Palamas, foreseeing the danger that these views held for Orthodoxy and through the power and energy of the Most Holy Spirit, drew a distinction between knowing God in his “essence”(Greek “ousia”) and knowing God in his “energies” (Greek “energeiai”). He maintained the Orthodox doctrine that it remains impossible to know God in His essence (to know who God is in and of Himself), but possible to know God in His energies (to know what God does, and who He is in relation to the creation and to man), as God reveals himself to humanity.
Gregory further asserted that when Saint Peter, James, son of Zebedee and John the Apostle witnessed the Transfiguration of Jesus on Mount Tabor, that they were in fact seeing the uncreated light of God; and that it is possible for others to be granted to see that same uncreated light of God with the help of certain spiritual disciplines and contemplative prayer, although not in any automatic or mechanistic fashion. In 1351 the Council of Blachernae upheld the Orthodoxy of his teachings.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 글
Ⅱ. 헤시카즘 논쟁
Ⅲ. 人間의 神化와 신의 빛의 신비체험
Ⅳ. 동방 정교회 신학의 이중구조
Ⅴ. 나가는 글: 동방정교회 신학의 재조명
參考文獻
【논문초록】

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-910-004449363