지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this article is to analyze the process of the formation of a cultural identity of the divided North and South Korea during the Cold War. And In doing so. I would like to reveal that the emergence and transformation of ‘Cold War nationalism’ was deeply intertwined with the intervention of the Cold War hegemons, the US and USSR.
There was the possibility of conflict between the hegemons which pursued a solid integration of the Cold war camp and new nation-states which pursued an equal status as a sovereign nation in the Cold War era. South Korea and North Korea were representative examples of the conflicts and ruptures, that emerged between hegemon states of the Cold War camp and nation state.
Political conflicts between hegemons and divided states on the Korean peninsula quickly transferred to the sphere of culture because the relationship between the cultural and political realm was so deep and inseparable. In other words, the influence of the US and USSR were so deeply and powerfully to the extent that the both divided countries could not make a cultural identity without the culture of the hegemon. That means the two divided states had faced serious obstacles against making a national identity as the starting point of the nation state and sovereign state.
Two divided states criticized influences this hegemonic influence in the late 1950’s and in the early 1960’s. and reached the stages to promulgate the making of a ‘civilization state’. Nevertheless. both states could not resolve ‘Cold War nationalism’ but rather made a ‘garrison state’. Ultimately. the two divided states could not overcome the national security crises created by the hegemons.
There was the possibility of conflict between the hegemons which pursued a solid integration of the Cold war camp and new nation-states which pursued an equal status as a sovereign nation in the Cold War era. South Korea and North Korea were representative examples of the conflicts and ruptures, that emerged between hegemon states of the Cold War camp and nation state.
Political conflicts between hegemons and divided states on the Korean peninsula quickly transferred to the sphere of culture because the relationship between the cultural and political realm was so deep and inseparable. In other words, the influence of the US and USSR were so deeply and powerfully to the extent that the both divided countries could not make a cultural identity without the culture of the hegemon. That means the two divided states had faced serious obstacles against making a national identity as the starting point of the nation state and sovereign state.
Two divided states criticized influences this hegemonic influence in the late 1950’s and in the early 1960’s. and reached the stages to promulgate the making of a ‘civilization state’. Nevertheless. both states could not resolve ‘Cold War nationalism’ but rather made a ‘garrison state’. Ultimately. the two divided states could not overcome the national security crises created by the hegemons.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 분할점령기 ‘선진문명’의 수용과 민족문화 모색
3. 전후 진영 내 갈등 표출과 ‘민족적인 것’의 강조
4. 총력안보체제의 구축과 ‘문명국가’의 귀결
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (51)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-000520964