지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis was drawn up to inquire into a new direction of Janghyunkwang(張顯光) Research in the field of the historical science. As one of the scholars representing Yeongnam Academic cirdes(嶺南學派) in early 17th century, Jang, Hyun-kwang won a popularity from Sarim(士林) as a mountain-forest politician(山林) after lnjo's enthronement and cultivated a literary group amounting to more than 300 scholars from Seoul, Chungcheongdo(忠?道), and north of Hwanghaedo(黃海道) and even up to Pyongando(平安道). However, in contrast with such a historical position of Jang, Hyun-kwang, the research on him and Yeohyun School in the field of Korean history can be said to be in its infancy now. For the inquiry into a new direction as to J ang, Hyunkwang research, this thesis digged into this subject in three points of view as follows:
First, I'd say that there should be an expansion of consciousness of the relationship between Jang, Hyun-kwang and Nammyung School(南冥學派). Up to now, the general consciousness that there is hardly any relationship between the two people is dominant, but the Nammyung-based elements connoted in Jang, Hyungkawng's disposition, his relationship with Jeong, In-hong that deserves to be dwelt upon and close exchange between lang, Hyun-kwang's descendants and Nammyung-circle personnel, etc. mean that lang, Hyunkwang and Nammyung school didn't exist separately at all.
In this thesis, this writer tried to find a clue to get the bilateral relationship much closer. Second, as for the issue of the consciousness of a scholastic mantle of lang, Hyunkwang and Yeohyun school(旅軒學派), it is what is called 'Hanyeosibi(寒旅是非)' controversy as to whether Jeonku(鄭述) and anghyunkwang were in relationship of master and pupil] that stands at a definite point.
This thesis brought forward the necessity of having a discussion about 'Hanyeosibi' in the eyesight and position that are newer and close to reality of that period . Another point in dispute of the consciousness of a school mantle is 'Buryusaseungron(不由師承諭), argument that there is no specific relation of master succession between them] which directly connects ]anghyunkwang's school mantle to 'Kongmaengjujeong(孔孟程朱), Confucius, Mencius, Jeongja, Chu-tz].
This research pointed out that this issue is also coupled with 'Hanyeosibi' and thus it cannot be overlooked at all in doing research on not only a school mantle but also Janghyungkwang's learning and idea.
Third, this research made a point of the pragmatic trend of Yeoheonhak. Until recently, lang, Hyunkwang's socio-political idea[statecraft theory] was grasped as an abstract-ideological general theory void of a substantial alternative, and toadyism for China, but this thesis has views on compilation of a topography in order to find out Yeohyunhak's pragmatic tendency.
Thus, this research found out that the topography compiled mostly by literary personnel had no flaws in pointing out Yeohyunhak's pragmatic trend and 'Yeohyunhak' represented a unique trend of learning of the coastal area of the Nakdong river(洛東江) enough to take its position as Hanyeo [Jeongku & JanghyunkwangJ common scholastic mantle.
First, I'd say that there should be an expansion of consciousness of the relationship between Jang, Hyun-kwang and Nammyung School(南冥學派). Up to now, the general consciousness that there is hardly any relationship between the two people is dominant, but the Nammyung-based elements connoted in Jang, Hyungkawng's disposition, his relationship with Jeong, In-hong that deserves to be dwelt upon and close exchange between lang, Hyun-kwang's descendants and Nammyung-circle personnel, etc. mean that lang, Hyunkwang and Nammyung school didn't exist separately at all.
In this thesis, this writer tried to find a clue to get the bilateral relationship much closer. Second, as for the issue of the consciousness of a scholastic mantle of lang, Hyunkwang and Yeohyun school(旅軒學派), it is what is called 'Hanyeosibi(寒旅是非)' controversy as to whether Jeonku(鄭述) and anghyunkwang were in relationship of master and pupil] that stands at a definite point.
This thesis brought forward the necessity of having a discussion about 'Hanyeosibi' in the eyesight and position that are newer and close to reality of that period . Another point in dispute of the consciousness of a school mantle is 'Buryusaseungron(不由師承諭), argument that there is no specific relation of master succession between them] which directly connects ]anghyunkwang's school mantle to 'Kongmaengjujeong(孔孟程朱), Confucius, Mencius, Jeongja, Chu-tz].
This research pointed out that this issue is also coupled with 'Hanyeosibi' and thus it cannot be overlooked at all in doing research on not only a school mantle but also Janghyungkwang's learning and idea.
Third, this research made a point of the pragmatic trend of Yeoheonhak. Until recently, lang, Hyunkwang's socio-political idea[statecraft theory] was grasped as an abstract-ideological general theory void of a substantial alternative, and toadyism for China, but this thesis has views on compilation of a topography in order to find out Yeohyunhak's pragmatic tendency.
Thus, this research found out that the topography compiled mostly by literary personnel had no flaws in pointing out Yeohyunhak's pragmatic trend and 'Yeohyunhak' represented a unique trend of learning of the coastal area of the Nakdong river(洛東江) enough to take its position as Hanyeo [Jeongku & JanghyunkwangJ common scholastic mantle.
#張顯光
#南冥學派
#寒旅是非
#不由師承論
#旅軒學
#地誌
#文獻ㆍ事蹟誌
#Jang, Hyun-kwang
#Nammyung Scholastic Mantle
#'Hanyeosibi'[controversy as to whether Jeonku and Janghyunkwan were in relationship of master and pupil]
#'Buryusaseungron'[argument that there is no specific relation of master succession]
#Yeohyunhak
#Compilation of a Topography
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 旅軒과 南冥學派와의 관계성에 대한 인식의 확대
Ⅲ. 여헌의 학통에 대한 재조명 - ‘寒旅是非’를 중심으로
Ⅳ. 여헌학의 실용적 경향에 대한 새로운 논의 - 地誌 및 文獻ㆍ事蹟誌 편찬을 중심으로
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (94)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
「旅軒 張顯光 易學思想의 구조와 목표」을 읽고
새한철학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2010 .04
-
旅軒 張顯光 易學思想의 구조와 목표
새한철학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2010 .04
-
旅軒 張顯光의 理氣에 대한 經緯論的 解釋
새한철학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2017 .11
-
政治史의 脈絡에서 본 南冥學派의 機承樣相 : 密陽ㆍ昌寧ㆍ靈山지역을 中心으로
장서각
2001 .12
-
조선중기 寒旅學派의 등장과 전개 : 문인록을 중심으로
한국학연구원 학술대회
2010 .06
-
旅軒 張顯光의 「立岩十三詠」 詩世界
모산학보
1998 .02
-
[이 책을 말한다]오이환, 『南冥學派硏究』
오늘의 동양사상
2001 .03
-
金文‘旅’字用例考
인문학논총
2013 .06
-
寒岡 鄭逑의 學問 淵源
한국학논집
2012 .09
-
南坡 張澩의 生涯와 學問 活動
동양고전연구
2008 .01
-
南冥學派 研究의 現況과 課題
한국인물사연구
2004 .09
-
朝鮮中期 南冥學派의 敎育運動
南冥學硏究
2002 .01
-
祈禱의 旅程
신학전망
1999 .03
-
남명의 생애와 발자취에 대한 연구의 회고와 전망
南冥學硏究
2012 .01
-
[영화] 어둠의 핵심을 향한 두 개의 여정(旅程)
황해문화
2008 .09
-
旅軒學의 實用的 面貌 : 道德 實踐과 우리 文化에 대한 主體意識 彈調
한국인물사연구
2014 .03
-
꿈과 욕망의 거울로서의 여행지(旅行誌)
황해문화
2010 .03
-
民國時期 上海 友聲旅行團과 ‘레저 여행’
중국근현대사연구
2008 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-051-000521011