지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The economics has a big influence on the commercial laws and the economy-related law in today. Organizational economics(Transaction cost approach), contract economics have in particular a big influence on the commercial law so far. The economics contributes to development of the law by offering logical prediction possibility for the reasoning as the vague of the law.
For example, so-called agent theory is fixed in what an economic discussion introduces it into in the commercial law. We have a meaning in the economics theory by letting you do the analysis tool in the commercial law wealthily. However, there is one point that you must be careful about. Little doubt is possible for organizational economics, contract economics influence on law. The model that is discussed in a area of the law, you must examine whether it is evaluated of organizational economics, contract economics. You must confirm whether the application does not have the inherent limitation.
Organizational economics has provided a theoretical background for the system of the legal rules about a corporation. However, Organizational economics in itself is not a complete economic theory. In addition, a complete market and the basics called a perfect rational human being that organizational economics premises are the suppositions that cannot consist. Therefore, a limit of the interpretation by it can occur.
There is so-called behavioral economics(experimental economics) as the economic theory that criticize the neoclassical school(microeconomics) recently. The behavioral economics denied a rational image of a human being(Homo Economicus) that neoclassical school made the premise. The behavioral economics classified the image of a human being of the irrationality into the field of vision and was going to take in psychology and a behavioral science in economics. The opinion of the behavioral economics has an influence on law mainly in U.S.A. and Europe.
It is necessary we receive a new economic theory in the study of the commercial law, and to solve classic difficult problems well from now on.
For example, so-called agent theory is fixed in what an economic discussion introduces it into in the commercial law. We have a meaning in the economics theory by letting you do the analysis tool in the commercial law wealthily. However, there is one point that you must be careful about. Little doubt is possible for organizational economics, contract economics influence on law. The model that is discussed in a area of the law, you must examine whether it is evaluated of organizational economics, contract economics. You must confirm whether the application does not have the inherent limitation.
Organizational economics has provided a theoretical background for the system of the legal rules about a corporation. However, Organizational economics in itself is not a complete economic theory. In addition, a complete market and the basics called a perfect rational human being that organizational economics premises are the suppositions that cannot consist. Therefore, a limit of the interpretation by it can occur.
There is so-called behavioral economics(experimental economics) as the economic theory that criticize the neoclassical school(microeconomics) recently. The behavioral economics denied a rational image of a human being(Homo Economicus) that neoclassical school made the premise. The behavioral economics classified the image of a human being of the irrationality into the field of vision and was going to take in psychology and a behavioral science in economics. The opinion of the behavioral economics has an influence on law mainly in U.S.A. and Europe.
It is necessary we receive a new economic theory in the study of the commercial law, and to solve classic difficult problems well from now on.
#신고전파 경제학
#법의 경제분석
#대리인이론, 대리인비용
#조직경제학
#계약경제학
#기업의 본질
#기업의 경계
#거래비용의 경제학
#회사법의 강행법규성
#주주의 의결권
#이사의 신인의무
#willingness to pay
#boundary of the firm
#arm's-length market transaction
#decreasing returns to the entrepreneur
#transaction costs
#relation-specific
#hold-up
#large private corporations
#agent theory
#nexus of contracts
#Nash bargaining solution
#Modigliani-Miller theorem
#leverage
#private ordering
#change of control
#franchisor
#franchisee
#moral hazard
#homogenous preference
#hidden ownership
#Homo Economicus
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 상법과 관련된 경제학이론-조직경제학을 중심으로
Ⅲ. 경제학이론의 상법에의 적용
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (3)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000490180