메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
세키네 히데유키 (경원대학교)
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아 문화연구 동북아 문화연구 제27집
발행연도
2011.6
수록면
605 - 624 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
‘The horse-rider hypothesis’ was a succeeding theory to that of Sadakichi Kita, a proponent of Ilsun donjoron, the argument that the Japanese and Korean peoples share common ancestry, which helped justify Japan’s colonial annexation and assimilation of Korea from 1910 to 1945. Namio Egami, an advocate of the horse-rider hypothesis, however, might have felt reserved about publishing the theory that seemed influenced by imperialist thoughts. This paper aims to examine how such consideration or reservation was reflected in Egami’s ethnogenetic theory of the Japanese people through the comparison with Kita’s. Both of them sought for the origin of Weain, rice farmers of ancient Japan, in the southern parts of China. Kita assumed, however, that Weain’s main route of migration to Japan was a land route that went north and turned across Santo peninsula and Korean peninsula and finally reached Kyushu, while Egami assumed that it was a sea route by which it went directly from China to Kyushu. Moreover, Kita regarded Weain, rice farmers in ancient Japan and Hanin, rice farmers in ancient Korea as almost the same race, while Egami distinguished Weain from Hanin definitely and interpreted the influence of Hanin on Japan as a cultural one rather than the result of migration. Both of them, however, concurred in identifying “the Tribe of Descendants of the Sun-Goddess” who ruled in ancient Japan as a branch of bigger Puyo tribe. Egami, however, linked their identity directly to Central Asia over Korean peninsula by adopting the concept of ‘horse-rider’. In brief, Egami seemed to have avoided the genealogical theorization on the relationship between the Korean race and Japanese race by tactfully operating on the concepts of “cultural diffusion” and “migration”. If this point of argument was treated lightly in Egami’s theorization, his theory would have been pointless however much it may have been modified.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 민족기원론과 민족이동
Ⅲ. 도작농경민의 민족이동
Ⅳ. 천손족의 민족이동
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
【논문초록】

참고문헌 (1)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-910-000268177