지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Bill of Rights in the Korean Constitution has been construed as being based on the idea of natural rights. Moreover, the social right clauses in the Constitution have been regarded as providing nothing but minimum standards. In the article, I trace the ur-constitutional documents in the late 19th century and examine the pre-constitutional documents in the first half of the 20th century, and draw some opposite conclusions. First, the equal protection clause has been overestimated as a dominant constitutional principle which has priority over any other fundamental rights in the Constitution. Second, the social rights have been regarded as substantial subjective rights of the citizen who wishes to realize the social and economic democracy of the new born republic. Third, the Bill of Rights has been textualized in the Constitution as positive rights which are based on strong statism and legalism. Since the 1948 Constitution, we Koreans have travelled the long and winding road toward the first-generation rights to civil and political freedom. And we are now standing at the starting point of the constitutional journey toward the second-generation rights to social and economic justice.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 개화기의 원시 헌법문서와 기본권
3. 임시정부 시기의 헌법 준비문서와 기본권
4. 해방기의 여러 헌법 초안과 기본권
5. 맺음말: 대한민국헌법 체제에서의 기본권 실현에 부쳐
참고자료: 본문에 인용한 개화기 헌법문서부터 대한민국헌법까지 기본권 조항 비교
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-905-000393570