지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study explains arbitration system which has recently increased in use between Korea and China as alternative dispute resolution. In particular, China Civil Enforcement Law and it’s problems are examined to find out improvements for enforcement of arbitral award in China.
Specially, this study addresses a way to solve the problems regarding China Civil Enforcement in several respects such as companies, arbitral institutions, national policy with regard to trade claims or disputes between Korea and China,
The main problems of enforcement in China are the absence of provisions related with Foreign-related arbitral award ,exceeded intervention of jurisdiction, problems of pre-report to upper court , strict interpretations of arbitral agreement, arbitration committee’ inventions in arbitral award. And In procedure’s problems of enforcement of arbitral award in China. there are complication of application procedure , difficulties in enforcement of arbitral award, the absence of time limit of hearing for enforcement cases requested , insufficient assistance and cooperation of Chinese court.
It is necessary that party autonomy be extended to secure effectiveness of arbitral award. Also administrative bodies should not interfere in arbitral institutions in order to present them with greater independence and autonomy for establishing arbitral institutions which is fair invulnerable in China as a dispute settlement body.
Starting proceedings of arbitration to protect substantive rights of an applicant or enforcement of attachment of the assets, interim measures of protection are institutionally required to build it’s own field.
In Kora, there will be needed to study chinese arbitration system in the view of the features that arbitration system are well developed by arbitrator’s award. It is positively necessary that companies trading with China be given appropriate system to know arbitration system which are not general for them.
Specially, this study addresses a way to solve the problems regarding China Civil Enforcement in several respects such as companies, arbitral institutions, national policy with regard to trade claims or disputes between Korea and China,
The main problems of enforcement in China are the absence of provisions related with Foreign-related arbitral award ,exceeded intervention of jurisdiction, problems of pre-report to upper court , strict interpretations of arbitral agreement, arbitration committee’ inventions in arbitral award. And In procedure’s problems of enforcement of arbitral award in China. there are complication of application procedure , difficulties in enforcement of arbitral award, the absence of time limit of hearing for enforcement cases requested , insufficient assistance and cooperation of Chinese court.
It is necessary that party autonomy be extended to secure effectiveness of arbitral award. Also administrative bodies should not interfere in arbitral institutions in order to present them with greater independence and autonomy for establishing arbitral institutions which is fair invulnerable in China as a dispute settlement body.
Starting proceedings of arbitration to protect substantive rights of an applicant or enforcement of attachment of the assets, interim measures of protection are institutionally required to build it’s own field.
In Kora, there will be needed to study chinese arbitration system in the view of the features that arbitration system are well developed by arbitrator’s award. It is positively necessary that companies trading with China be given appropriate system to know arbitration system which are not general for them.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중국에서의 중재판정의 집행제도
Ⅲ. 중재판정의 강제집행 상의 문제점 및 대응방안
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (67)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
선택적 중재합의의 유효성에 관한 법적 연구
김순이
동아법학
2012
.08
[보고서] 공공분쟁의 효율적 해결방안에 대한 연구 : 서울특별시 사례를 중심으로
김태기
,
김학린
,
권혜경
외 1명
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2007
.12
[토론문] 「한국법원의 판결과 중재판정의 중국에서의 승인 및 집행」에 관한 토론요지
이규호
국제사법연구
2007
.12
한국법원의 판결과 중재판정의 중국에서의 승인 및 집행
Wang Hongpeng
,
노광
,
강영화
국제사법연구
2007
.12
2008년 국제사법 주요 판례 소개
노태악
국제사법연구
2008
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-326-000658282