메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
Chan-ung Park (연세대학교) Dongchul Jung (연세대학교)
저널정보
한국사회학회 한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집 한국사회학회 2008 후기 사회학대회
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
662 - 686 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Increasing number of studies has focused on categorizing Asian countries based on welfare programs. However, they relied on typologies based on Western countries or covered only a small number of Asian countries. A few studies examined Asian countries without the Western counterparts. As an alternative, we examined the overall development of the welfare programs of the 9 Asian countries and 17 Western countries together. For the comparative study including both Western and Asian countries, we need new standard because the data from the given-studies do not encompass Asian countries. We developed a weflare state typoloy with the contents of welfare programs (program types, benefits, eligibility, coverage, financing, and education). First, we compared the previous typologies of welfare states and our typology based on the western countries. Second, we applied our typology to both Western and the Asian countries to see a possibility of unique Asian models. Finally, we examined similarities and differences within the Asian countries.
We get five groups in the analysis including both Asian and Western countries together: first, Australia and Hong Kong; second, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore; third, Austria, Belgium, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan; fourth, France, Germany, and Spain; fifth, Denmark and Sweden. We found that not only the Asian countries tend to be different from the Western types, but also found three groups within the Asian countries. The first one is Hong Kong: its mandatory occupational account program in old age pension is a key factor. The second group includes Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore, which have provident fund systems. The last group is all the other countries with a strong development of social insurance programs.

목차

Abstract
“Asian” Welfare Regimes?
Ideal Types of Welfare State
Welfare State Typologies
The Typologies of the Asian Welfare Regimes
Data and Method
Comparison of Typologies of Western Welfare States
Applying New Classification to More Countries
Asian Welfare State Regime?
Discussion
Reference

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-331-000700224