지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The importance of the Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, which governs the sale of goods in the U.S.A., is evidenced by the fact that it has been dubbed as the heart of the Code. Since its adoption in the 50’s, however, the need for its revision to reflect the market realities and to protect consumers has been hotly and continuously debated. Critics have argued that Article 2 failed to codify the consumer rights, ignoring the fact that consumers generally do not have equal bargaining power and knowledge against big manufacturers and professional sellers in the market.
As a result of these debates and criticism, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (“NCCUSL”) and the American Law Institute (“ALI”) undertook the revision project more than twenty years ago. Their originally stated goal was to have an extensive revision of the Article 2. The consumer movement groups warmheartedly welcomed their efforts, expecting that the revised Article 2 would provide a fairer market for the consumers in general. NCCUSL and ALI produced a draft in 1999, which somehow met these expectations. at least superficially.
However, the revision process did not unfold in the expected way. Due to the heavy lobbying by the manufacturing and retail industries against any revision whatsoever, the drafters abandoned the 1999 draft. Indeed, they decided that Article 2 did not need any extensive revision, but minor amendments to its existing provisions.
With the above as a background, this article reviews the revision process for the past twenty years and examines the contents of the final amendments with a view point toward consumer protection. In Part II, following the introduction, the historical background of the UCC, the revision efforts on the Article 2 up to year 2003 are described and discussed. In Part III. the contents of the final amendments and their limits and shortcomings with respect to consumer rights are discussed. In Part IV, this article concludes that it was unfortunate that the revision process only produced amendments only and that state legislatures should be careful in adopting these amendments.
As a result of these debates and criticism, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (“NCCUSL”) and the American Law Institute (“ALI”) undertook the revision project more than twenty years ago. Their originally stated goal was to have an extensive revision of the Article 2. The consumer movement groups warmheartedly welcomed their efforts, expecting that the revised Article 2 would provide a fairer market for the consumers in general. NCCUSL and ALI produced a draft in 1999, which somehow met these expectations. at least superficially.
However, the revision process did not unfold in the expected way. Due to the heavy lobbying by the manufacturing and retail industries against any revision whatsoever, the drafters abandoned the 1999 draft. Indeed, they decided that Article 2 did not need any extensive revision, but minor amendments to its existing provisions.
With the above as a background, this article reviews the revision process for the past twenty years and examines the contents of the final amendments with a view point toward consumer protection. In Part II, following the introduction, the historical background of the UCC, the revision efforts on the Article 2 up to year 2003 are described and discussed. In Part III. the contents of the final amendments and their limits and shortcomings with respect to consumer rights are discussed. In Part IV, this article concludes that it was unfortunate that the revision process only produced amendments only and that state legislatures should be careful in adopting these amendments.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. UCC 역사적 배경과 최근의 개정, 수정 경위
Ⅲ. UCC 제2편 최종 수정안(Amendments to the Article 2 of the UCC)의 소비자 관련 주요 조항 및 그 한계
Ⅳ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
미국통일상법전 제5-109조에 대한 일고찰
무역상무연구
2000 .06
-
전자상거래소비자보호법 개정안에 대한 고찰 : 공정거래위원회의 전면개정안을 중심으로
한양법학
2019 .02
-
상법 개정시안에 대한 검토 - 해상운송 관련내용을 중심으로 -
기업법연구
2005 .12
-
소비자기본법의 문제점과 개정의견
기업법연구
2009 .03
-
韓･中 소비자법제 기본법의 비교
원광법학
2008 .01
-
소비자보호법의 개정방향 : 소비자보호법의 전면개정과 관련하여
공법학연구
2005 .02
-
일본의 방문판매에 관한 법개정 논의
비교사법
2008 .03
-
소비자의 개념에 관한 연구
法學論文集
2016 .01
-
미국통일상법전 제 2편(매매)의 주요 개정논점
경영법률
2006 .01
-
일본 민법개정시안에 있어서 소비자법의 위치
재산법연구
2009 .01
-
2010년 改正商法에 대한 管見
비교사법
2010 .12
-
국제사법 제27조에 의해 보호되는 소비자계약의 범위와 수동적 소비자가 되기 위한 요건의 분석
소비자문제연구
2018 .08
-
민법의 제정 과정에 대한 입법평가
법과정책
2018 .01
-
인공지능 시대 소비자 보호 이념의 수정
중국법연구
2020 .01
-
일본의 헌법 개정에 대한 고찰 : 제9조 개정을 중심으로
국제정치연구
2002 .06
-
정부 분야별 정책ㆍ제도의 소비자지향성 연구 Ⅴ
정책연구보고서
2013 .11
-
정부 분야별 정책·제도의 소비자지향성 연구(IV)
정책연구보고서
2012 .12
-
소비자계약법상의 정보제공의무와 그 실효성에 관한 비판적 고찰
경영법률
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000704138