지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Appeared in the 1970s he started the global warming problem of carbon reduction, unlike the expected withdrawal of the United States was anticipated to be nominal stripping. However, EU mainly carbon market, buy and sell rights to be disposed of evolution was born. In fact, the current reduction of the Kyoto Protocol, and Korea will be designated as the bureau had been scheduled. However, due to economic recession in Korea’s status as exempt countries have enjoyed a considerable period.
Global warming is a problem in earnest, however, the United States to participate in one or more such discussions since 2013, clearly this will begin the international order. And international order that is more stringent than expected, and is expected to be strong. Then, however, an interesting thing to justify protection of the environment in some countries to protect domestic industry, the movement is visible is the side. In fact the WTO since the conclusion of all non-tariff trade barriers were abolished. However, recently, New Round of the delay based on reciprocity and fair trade in the framework of environmental protection to justify the movement to protect the domestic industry has been captured.
These trends are not friendly, never in Korea. The rationale is that these regulations are enforced, many of our countries and countries with significant trade transactions and the enforcement points. And South Korea’s automotive, semiconductors, ships, etc. The main products are much discussed in the international regulations are being referred to as the target point is due.
Korean government to actively participate in the international situation and efforts to explore new markets, said yesterday, and ‘Low Carbon, Green Growth’ was declared. And the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC) recommendations of the best 30% reduction target was present. This is nothing different about this objection is true.
A more fundamental solution to faithfully perform the reduction targets, while the development of environmentally friendly products and the incidence of international standards through the development and expansion of new growth engines, Indeed we are expected to be a fundamental methodology.
Global warming is a problem in earnest, however, the United States to participate in one or more such discussions since 2013, clearly this will begin the international order. And international order that is more stringent than expected, and is expected to be strong. Then, however, an interesting thing to justify protection of the environment in some countries to protect domestic industry, the movement is visible is the side. In fact the WTO since the conclusion of all non-tariff trade barriers were abolished. However, recently, New Round of the delay based on reciprocity and fair trade in the framework of environmental protection to justify the movement to protect the domestic industry has been captured.
These trends are not friendly, never in Korea. The rationale is that these regulations are enforced, many of our countries and countries with significant trade transactions and the enforcement points. And South Korea’s automotive, semiconductors, ships, etc. The main products are much discussed in the international regulations are being referred to as the target point is due.
Korean government to actively participate in the international situation and efforts to explore new markets, said yesterday, and ‘Low Carbon, Green Growth’ was declared. And the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC) recommendations of the best 30% reduction target was present. This is nothing different about this objection is true.
A more fundamental solution to faithfully perform the reduction targets, while the development of environmentally friendly products and the incidence of international standards through the development and expansion of new growth engines, Indeed we are expected to be a fundamental methodology.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 현안 검토
Ⅲ. 우리나라 수출에 미치는 영향과 대응 방향
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (41)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
녹색도시 조성제도 개선을 위한 해외사례 분석 연구
주거환경
2013 .06
-
저탄소 녹색성장 평가를 위한 ‘녹색교역지수’ 개발 방안 연구
관세학회지
2010 .08
-
녹색보호주의 대응을 위한 전담기구 설립의 필요성 및 그 효과에 대한 검토 : G20 서울 정상회의에서의 한국의 역할을 중심으로
국제경제법연구
2010 .05
-
Trade Protectionism and Economic Growth : The Chinese Example
Global Asia
2009 .10
-
저탄소 녹색성장산업 육성전략에 관한 연구 : 대전광역시 사례를 중심으로
도시행정학보
2011 .09
-
한국의 녹색성장전략 변화에 관한 연구
산업경제연구
2012 .06
-
국제무역 환경 규제에 따른 국내 기업의 대응전략
산업경제연구
2011 .04
-
환경관련 조항의 헌법상 위상에 대한 재조명
법학연구
2009 .12
-
녹색성장 및 그린IT에 대한 소비자인식 현황
정보사회와 미디어
2009 .12
-
WTO 체제하 중국의 무역법 및 기후변화법 충돌의 개선방안 연구
경영법률
2014 .01
-
국내의 가정 탄소포인트제도 정착을 위한 방안 연구
한국환경정책학회 학술대회논문집
2010 .10
-
녹색성장과 과학기술법제
공법학연구
2010 .02
-
녹색성장을 위한 그린IT 현황과 활성화 방안에 관한 연구
전자무역연구
2009 .01
-
저탄소 녹색성장을 위한 그린 IT 정책 추진 방향
정보사회와 미디어
2008 .12
-
기후변화의 국제정치경제 : 기후변화레짐 내 환경-무역 갈등
한국사회와 행정연구
2010 .11
-
지속가능발전과 녹색성장
서강법학
2009 .12
-
한국에서의 녹색성장 정책의 시사점에 관한 연구
전자무역연구
2010 .01
-
New Trade Protectionism : challenges and recommendations for Vietnamese export firms at important Asian markets
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2017 .11
-
신보호무역주의와 대응방안
인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회
2016 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-326-000770756