지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper focuses on cases of suicide in 《Trial Document(審理錄; Simrirok)》 which was published in Jeongjo(正祖)’s reign, and how to understand suicide cases in social context. Even though 《Trial Document》 is limited historical material to report for King, it is very useful to examine not only suicide case of those times but also the elite’s recognition about suicide. Especially in this paper, the important point is not ‘why and how did a suicide kill himself or herself’ but ‘how people did understand about suicide or a suicide’. In other words, the key point of this paper is ‘discourse’ of suicide.
There are so multifarious suicide cases in 《Trial Document》 and the reasons of suicide are also multifarious. However, 《Trial Document》 is worthy of note because it is the document which was recorded trial processes. In these processes, decision on ‘suicide or murder’ was the most essential point. So there were arguments on discerning whether a victim committed suicide or a murderer counterfeited a victim’s suicide. The important thing was not only real evidence in these arguments. Belief, ‘it is acceptable reason for suicide’, was very important as a social context.
One of the important criterions was ‘gender’ to Jeoseon’s elite. In spite of cases’ similarities, the interpretation was completely different by gender. Men’s suicide was understood as ‘a foolish act’ by the elite because they thought that ‘normal man’ would not commit suicide. Moreover, there were particular women’s suicide cases which could not happen to men. The reason of these suicides was ‘chastity’. The cases were also ‘interpreted’ by the people alive. These interpretation was based on the value judgement. And another important criterion was class. The elite had given a prize(旌門) to the women who suicided directly after their husbands’ death. The elite themselves, however, did not suicide so much as the common people did. This contradiction shows that suicide is not a personal choice absolutely.
This paper searches into the meaning of suicide in late Joseon society, and look into ‘gender’ as the most important criterion of judgement.
There are so multifarious suicide cases in 《Trial Document》 and the reasons of suicide are also multifarious. However, 《Trial Document》 is worthy of note because it is the document which was recorded trial processes. In these processes, decision on ‘suicide or murder’ was the most essential point. So there were arguments on discerning whether a victim committed suicide or a murderer counterfeited a victim’s suicide. The important thing was not only real evidence in these arguments. Belief, ‘it is acceptable reason for suicide’, was very important as a social context.
One of the important criterions was ‘gender’ to Jeoseon’s elite. In spite of cases’ similarities, the interpretation was completely different by gender. Men’s suicide was understood as ‘a foolish act’ by the elite because they thought that ‘normal man’ would not commit suicide. Moreover, there were particular women’s suicide cases which could not happen to men. The reason of these suicides was ‘chastity’. The cases were also ‘interpreted’ by the people alive. These interpretation was based on the value judgement. And another important criterion was class. The elite had given a prize(旌門) to the women who suicided directly after their husbands’ death. The elite themselves, however, did not suicide so much as the common people did. This contradiction shows that suicide is not a personal choice absolutely.
This paper searches into the meaning of suicide in late Joseon society, and look into ‘gender’ as the most important criterion of judgement.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 《審理錄》에 나타난 자살 사례 분석
3. 남성의 자살 - 자살자에 대한 멸시
4. 여성의 자살 - 성품(性稟)과 주체 혹은 멸시와 찬탄
5. 자살에 대한 지배계층의 모순적 태도
6. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
자살과 해체사회
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2010 .06
-
자살문제에대한 성경적-신학적 접근
장신논단
2010 .09
-
자살에 대한 정신의학적 이해 및 예방대책
신학과 사회
2012 .01
-
한국사회의 자살 : 정신보건적 측면에서의 이해와 대처
생명연구
2009 .01
-
자살자의 죽음이해 분석 : 자살자의 유서를 중심으로
인문과학연구
2014 .09
-
자살에 대한 사회 윤리적 처방
윤리연구
2019 .01
-
한국사회의 자살: 윤리적 문제
생명연구
2009 .01
-
자살의 윤리적 문제
기독교사회윤리
2011 .01
-
한국 사회의 자살에 대한 시선 : 노무현 전 대통령을 중심으로
종교문화연구
2011 .06
-
미국 희곡 속에 나타난 자살의 문제—아서 밀러의 극을 중심으로
영어영문학연구
2015 .01
-
흄의 자살론
철학연구
2007 .09
-
우리나라 청년 자살의 특징과 변증법적 행동치료 위기개입
대학과 선교
2007 .01
-
자살과 문학, 그리고 셰익스피어
영어영문학연구
2013 .01
-
야스퍼스의 자살에 대한 철학적 고찰과 철학상담
철학연구
2020 .09
-
생명존중 사회형성을 위한 기독교교육의 역할-자살예방교육을 중심으로-
기독교교육 논총
2016 .01
-
자살에 관한 문화적 학습 및 재생산의 경로 : 중국 농촌 여성의 사례
비교문화연구
2010 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
자살에 대한 사회적 성찰과 죽음학
문영석
인간연구
2011
.01
한국사회 자살현상과 『자살론』의 실재론적 해석 : 숙명론적 자살(fatalistic suicide)을 중심으로
김명희
경제와사회
2012
.12
근대 초기의 자살 (5) : 자살 문제에 대한 국가와 제도의 대응
천정환
내일을 여는 역사
2012
.03
자살의 사회적 원인과 도덕적 치료에 관한 연구 : 에밀 뒤르껭의 사회적 자살론을 중심으로
김철영
장신논단
2009
.12
5세기 고구려 고분벽화의 불교적 요소와 그 연원
김진순
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2008
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-510-000772621