지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Sijeon (Licensed Shop) was an essential element for the capital of the Joseon Dynasty. Sijeon is a commercial organization for royal use that was established in order to supply luxuries to a royal family and the governing class.
Sijeon merchants were in charge of commercial tax(商稅)， Chaekpan(責辦) and miscellaneous work(雜役) in the early Josen Dynasty. In the latter half of the Joseon Dynasty, commercial tax was abolished while being transformed into state service(國役) focusing on Suridobaeyeok for the royal palace. In addition, Chaekpan was transformed into trade(貿易) and Jinbae(進排)， and miscellaneous work into Jangbingyeok(藏永役)， etc. Although Sijeon focused on distribution of goods for the private sector rather than supply for the royal family in the latter half of the Joseon Dynasty, it couldn"t break from its feature of royal use completely.
Even though Suridobaeyeok for the royal palace was 6,600 bags a year putting a heavy burden on the merchants, the Sijeon merchants could enjoy Geumnanjeongwon(禁亂廛權)， an exclusive right for distribution of goods, in reward for this duty. Trade meant that the Sijeon merchants provided articles urgently desired by the government or the royal family. The outward of trade was market exchange though, the merchants were always in disadvantageous positions because the royal family never paid proper market price.
Jinbae means regular supply of articles required by the royal family and it could give a large profit to the Sijeon merchants compared with trade. However, it could become exploitative relationship like Chaekpan when financial condition of the royal family became worse.
Sijeon was originally a commercial organization for royal use, therefore, the royal family supported it with money from its private safe when the Sijeon merchants were badly damaged by fire. As stated above, the royal family and the Sijeon merchants were in special relationship. The relationship existed even after the privilege disappeared by the abolishment of Geumnanjeongwon because of Gabogaehyeok (the Political Reform) in 1894 since the absolute monarch system and Sijeon commerce originated from the same root.
Sijeon merchants were in charge of commercial tax(商稅)， Chaekpan(責辦) and miscellaneous work(雜役) in the early Josen Dynasty. In the latter half of the Joseon Dynasty, commercial tax was abolished while being transformed into state service(國役) focusing on Suridobaeyeok for the royal palace. In addition, Chaekpan was transformed into trade(貿易) and Jinbae(進排)， and miscellaneous work into Jangbingyeok(藏永役)， etc. Although Sijeon focused on distribution of goods for the private sector rather than supply for the royal family in the latter half of the Joseon Dynasty, it couldn"t break from its feature of royal use completely.
Even though Suridobaeyeok for the royal palace was 6,600 bags a year putting a heavy burden on the merchants, the Sijeon merchants could enjoy Geumnanjeongwon(禁亂廛權)， an exclusive right for distribution of goods, in reward for this duty. Trade meant that the Sijeon merchants provided articles urgently desired by the government or the royal family. The outward of trade was market exchange though, the merchants were always in disadvantageous positions because the royal family never paid proper market price.
Jinbae means regular supply of articles required by the royal family and it could give a large profit to the Sijeon merchants compared with trade. However, it could become exploitative relationship like Chaekpan when financial condition of the royal family became worse.
Sijeon was originally a commercial organization for royal use, therefore, the royal family supported it with money from its private safe when the Sijeon merchants were badly damaged by fire. As stated above, the royal family and the Sijeon merchants were in special relationship. The relationship existed even after the privilege disappeared by the abolishment of Geumnanjeongwon because of Gabogaehyeok (the Political Reform) in 1894 since the absolute monarch system and Sijeon commerce originated from the same root.
목차
I. 머리말
II. 시전의 國役과 大內修理
III. 시전의 貿易과 進排
IV. 시전의 화재와 內帑지원
V. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (20)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일제강점기 李王家 世襲財産의 종류와 기능
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2016 .10
-
근대 이행기(1894~1919) 서울 시전 상업의 변화
서울학연구
2004 .03
-
세계유산 조선 왕릉의 관광자원화 방안
농어촌관광학회지
2013 .12
-
진주시 요일장의 입지와 요일장 상인의 특성에 대한 연구
한국지역지리학회지
2010 .10
-
전통시장의 상인조직형태에 따른 특성 분석
주거환경
2014 .09
-
중국 민상법체계에서의 상사주체 －한국 상법과의 비교－
중국법연구
2010 .01
-
True Geographical Value of Royal Tombs in Chosun Dynasty
대한지리학회 컨퍼런스 자료집
2011 .11
-
关于当代儒商和君子的浅谈与认识
중국연구
2017 .01
-
개항전후기 시전상업의 변화 : 綿袖塵을 중심으로
서울학연구
2008 .08
-
1945년 이후 경복궁 연구의 성과와 과제
서울학연구
2007 .08
-
조선후기 시전인과 공인의 병존 관계 : 지전-지계, 진사전-진사계 사례를 중심으로
서울학연구
2018 .11
-
조선후기 사상(私商)의 대청무역 연결망과 정책의 변화
동북아 문화연구
2013 .06
-
한·중 발전 새로운 패러다임 : 한·화상의 협력
디아스포라연구
2007 .12
-
조선후기 국왕 행차와 거둥길
서울학연구
2008 .02
-
지방소도시 상권 도시재생의 활성화 연구
주거환경
2019 .09
-
19世紀後半 內需司와 市廛의 去來實態
서울학연구
2008 .05
-
개항기(1894~1905) 인천항의 금융 네트워크와 韓商의 성장조건
인천학연구
2004 .09
-
조선 왕실의 친족 의식과 족파(族派), 그리고 한국 전통적 가족관계
아세아연구
2019 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
조선 후기 장시 발달과 사회·문화 생활 변화
김대길
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2012
.12
자본주의 맹아론과 조선후기 상업 변동 : 강만길 《朝鮮後期 商業資本의 發達》을 중심으로
고동환
한국사연구
2009
.12
조선후기 시전의 구조와 기능
고동환
역사와현실
2002
.06
조선후기 유통사 연구의 새로운 국면을 지향하며 : 고동환, 『조선시대 시전상업 연구』 (지식산업사, 2013) ; 이영학, 『한국 근대 연초산업 연구』 (신서원, 2013) ; 정수환, 『조선후기 화폐유통과 경제생활』 (경인문화사, 2013)
조영준
역사와현실
2014
.03
조선후기 한강변의 상품경제 발전과 상업정책의 변화
이욱
서울학연구
2005
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-000992066