메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김제정 (서울대학교)
저널정보
서울시립대학교 서울학연구소 서울학연구 서울학연구 제29호
발행연도
2007.8
수록면
251 - 278 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The movement against the abolishment of the electric cars" outskirts line, which continued during 1932 and 1933, was a local movement originated from the outskirts area of the Gyeongseong-bu. This movement was based upon the dual structure of the Gyeongseong area and also the interests of the majority of the local residents, and continued for quite some time. The movement also involved, albeit partially, a nationalist agenda, and therefore was supported by the Joseon community as well. The movement proceeded in the most typical fashion we can observe from the Japanese occupation period. The issues were originated from the local resident leaders" meetings, then further discussed in conferences between representatives of Dong - Ri units, and then a movement community was organized to raise money and propagate their issues, and such efforts eventually resulted in the commencement of resident campaigns and submission of appeals. This movement was a rare success compared to other movements that were attempted under the colonial ruling. Although the movement featured one big flaw of having the colonial authorities involve themselves in the movement, the local movement itself was another opportunity of forming a public consensus nonetheless.
And the concept suggested for the cause of the movement was "public interest". At the time, terms like "public interest" or public matter" meant "the interest of the majority", and in local movements, these terms meant the "common interest of the local residents". Electric cars were public assets that were usually used by all the members of local communities, so such assets always had the potential to generate a region-wide issue of common interest regardless of social classes or nationalities. In case of this electric car issue, "safety and conveniences", protection of existing rights", local developments" were raised as reasons why such movement was necessary. And compared to this public interest" in the issue involving electric cars, the private(私) interest was known to be represented by a civilian company named the Gyeongseong Electricity corporation. There was a social perceptive that civilian companies in charge of public-natured businesses were required to serve public interests even such serving would limit the companies" pursuit of private interests or their excercise of property rights.
The movement was led by local influentials, and also the collaborators of the colonial authorities. They maintained their cause of public interest while also holding onto their private profits, and the cause of "local development" was what made that possible. This local development" cause was a social and economical basis which legitimatized the concept of collaborating with the colonial ruling, and the public"s being assimilated into the occupation system.

목차

I. 머리말
II. 경성 지역의 이중구조와 전차 문제
III. 1932~33년의 전차 교외선 폐지 반대 운동
IV. 반대 운동의 논리와 이를 통해 본 운동의 성격
V. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-000992182