지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The punishment matters concerning to the perpetrators for the killing of civilians during Korean War is one of controversial legal issues. Studies have been focused on the illegality over summary execution of civilians without fair trials and due legal procedures in the light of the victims and their families.
This study concerning to what is the nature of the law as it was considered the unarmed massacres perpetrated by the military, police and other state’s actors during Korean War time. This study finds two facts. One is that then state’s legal system in the legal texts including the constitution and the law of other related people’s rights existed and there was no any legal authority and powers to do political killings for the military and members of then ruling power, and the legal system did not work well in reality. The other is that, although the perpetrators including its commanders should be punished, immunities have be continued under any current
laws.
So under the circumstances of the reality, I urge that Korean society had better prepare the state’s preventive measures including state’s official declaration for the civilians killings without the due process during war time as a crime, than punishment over perpetrators in the process of transitional justice.
This study concerning to what is the nature of the law as it was considered the unarmed massacres perpetrated by the military, police and other state’s actors during Korean War time. This study finds two facts. One is that then state’s legal system in the legal texts including the constitution and the law of other related people’s rights existed and there was no any legal authority and powers to do political killings for the military and members of then ruling power, and the legal system did not work well in reality. The other is that, although the perpetrators including its commanders should be punished, immunities have be continued under any current
laws.
So under the circumstances of the reality, I urge that Korean society had better prepare the state’s preventive measures including state’s official declaration for the civilians killings without the due process during war time as a crime, than punishment over perpetrators in the process of transitional justice.
목차
머리말: 국가안보, 전쟁, 법치
Ⅰ. 한국전쟁기 민간인 학살과 국가법 체계
Ⅱ. 한국전쟁기 민간인 학살과 국제인도법 체계
맺음말: 한국전쟁기 집단학살 가해자 법적 처벌의 한계와 국가의 책무
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
Allan R. Millett / Their War for Korea: American, Asian, and European Combatants and Civilians, 1945~53 / Brassey's, Inc. :266
진실·화해를위한과거사정리위원회 / 2010 / 진실화해위원회 종합보고서 I: 위원회의 연혁과 활동 종합권고
조용환 / 2000 / 21세기의 인권 Ⅱ / 한길사 :1166~1203
김순태 / 1998 / 제주4·3민중항쟁 당시 계엄에 관한 고찰-계엄의 법적 근거 유무에 대한 판단을 중심으로 / 민주법학 (14):257~274
문준영 / 2007 / 미군정 법령체제와 국방경비법 / 민주법학 (34):97~136
진실·화해를위한과거사정리위원회 / 2010 / 진실화해위원회 종합보고서 I: 위원회의 연혁과 활동 종합권고
조용환 / 2000 / 21세기의 인권 Ⅱ / 한길사 :1166~1203
김순태 / 1998 / 제주4·3민중항쟁 당시 계엄에 관한 고찰-계엄의 법적 근거 유무에 대한 판단을 중심으로 / 민주법학 (14):257~274
문준영 / 2007 / 미군정 법령체제와 국방경비법 / 민주법학 (34):97~136
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-001425837