지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Social movement for the truth of civilian massacre and restoration of sacrificed around Korean war has been started from 2000 and resulted in special law legislation by the 5 years hard struggle. The Establishment of formal government organization, Truth and Reconciliation Commission is an institutionalization of sacrificed and NPO's joint ask. It means that Korean political society choose rather the truth-reconciliation exchange model than justice model.
The Commission adopted a self-reporting system for the problem solving, but self-reporting system has some problem owing to its deep depending on socio-political environments. In political terms, South-North relation and potential alteration of government, National security law confined the self-reporting of sacrificed. In social terms, self-reporting is affected by recognition and accessibility on Commission, compensation, networking among sacrificed and commitment of backward group. Even it is inevitable, self-reporting system is a kind of minimizing mechanism of clearing-up the civilian massacre incidents
The commission declared the principle of unification. Truth and reconciliation are accepted so abstractedly, but it is so difficult to define the substantial meaning of reconciliation and realizing mechanism of it. The dilemma of Commission are come from not only the pressure of conservative camp, but also the deep discrepancy between high expectation of sacrificed and capacity of Commission, and difficulty of international cooperation by U.S. It needs not only law-institutional approach, but also socio-cultural moment for the reconciliation. It is difficult to make some chances to reflect and introspect on past tragedy owing to Korean political culture.
The Commission adopted a self-reporting system for the problem solving, but self-reporting system has some problem owing to its deep depending on socio-political environments. In political terms, South-North relation and potential alteration of government, National security law confined the self-reporting of sacrificed. In social terms, self-reporting is affected by recognition and accessibility on Commission, compensation, networking among sacrificed and commitment of backward group. Even it is inevitable, self-reporting system is a kind of minimizing mechanism of clearing-up the civilian massacre incidents
The commission declared the principle of unification. Truth and reconciliation are accepted so abstractedly, but it is so difficult to define the substantial meaning of reconciliation and realizing mechanism of it. The dilemma of Commission are come from not only the pressure of conservative camp, but also the deep discrepancy between high expectation of sacrificed and capacity of Commission, and difficulty of international cooperation by U.S. It needs not only law-institutional approach, but also socio-cultural moment for the reconciliation. It is difficult to make some chances to reflect and introspect on past tragedy owing to Korean political culture.
목차
1. 문제 제기
2. 진실ㆍ화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회의 성립과정
3. 진화위의 조직과 활동
4. 전망
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
국가기관의 민주화와 과거사청산
역사비평
2010 .11
-
남아공 시민사회와 진실화해위원회
역사비평
2014 .11
-
교양소설(Bildungsroman)의 종언과 진 리스의 『어둠속의 항해』
외국문학연구
2020 .02
-
[기획4 : 전쟁기 민간인 학살과 국가의 책임] 6ㆍ25 남북전쟁시기 이북지역에서의 민간인 학살
역사와현실
2004 .12
-
우리는 진실과 화해를 향하여 어디까지 갈 수 있는가
제노사이드연구
2009 .02
-
[기획2 : 전쟁기 민간인 학살과 국가의 책임] 한국전쟁기 민간인 학살에 관한 자료 실태와 연구현황
역사와현실
2004 .12
-
Meta-reconciliation and a Reconciliation through Healing
신학연구
2008 .12
-
Meta-reconciliation and a Reconciliation through Healing
시대와민중신학
2009 .12
-
과거청산과 민주주의 실현 : 진실화해위원회 활동과 권고사항의 이행기 정의를 중심으로
역사비평
2010 .11
-
지연된 진실규명, 더욱 지연된 후속작업 : 진실화해위원회 활동의 완수를 위한 과제들
역사비평
2012 .08
-
한국 과거청산의 현황과 과제
역사비평
2010 .11
-
Reconciliation of Nations for the Survival of Humankind
Korea Observer
2019 .01
-
The Evolution of the Ŭimunsa Truth Finding Movement and Its Tasks
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2003 .06
-
Reconciliation and Healing at the Case of the Grand Massacre during the April Third Uprising 1948-1949
신학연구
2008 .12
-
고려전기의 戶部와 三司 : 당ㆍ송제도와의 비교
역사학보
2005 .12
-
한국전쟁기 강화도에서의 대량학살사건과 트라우마 : 1950년 10월~1951년 6월을 중심으로
제노사이드연구
2008 .02
-
진실규명의 제도화와 다층적 재조명 : 민간인의 집단적 죽음을 중심으로
제노사이드연구
2009 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
폭력과 제노사이드를 예방할 수 있는 윤리는 무엇인가?, 김상기, 2008, 『제노사이드 속 폭력의 법칙』, 도서출판선인
김학재
제노사이드연구
2008
.08
전쟁과 법치 : 민간인 집단학살 가해자의 처벌 가능성을 중심으로
이창수
역사연구
2011
.12
제노사이드의 사회이론 : 비판적 고찰과 발전적 함의
장원석
평화연구
2012
.10
금기로서의 제노사이드, 그 혼돈의 진실 : 황석영의 『손님』을 중심으로
양진오
인문과학연구
2007
.02
한국전쟁기 강화도에서의 대량학살사건과 트라우마 : 1950년 10월~1951년 6월을 중심으로
김귀옥
제노사이드연구
2008
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-392-002319157