지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship of the family (oikos) and the state (polis) of Aristotle, based on Aristotle’s critique of Plato’s community of wives and children and community of property. Generally, some scholars who aim at an ideal state make reference to a community of wives and children as well as seeking a community of property like Plato. It might derive from simple thought that a person is fundamentally selfish existence and private greed is not conductive to the state.
On the contrary, Aristotle points out that even if human beings are selfish, family is based on the soundness of the state (polis). Even if man is by nature a political animal, in the family, if not allowing private property, head of households may not do political activities.
The ultimate purpose of this paper is not to inquire into the relationship of the family and the state Aristotle declares, but to identity why the family should not miss out on the discourse of communalism, and the positive meaning which family has.
On the contrary, Aristotle points out that even if human beings are selfish, family is based on the soundness of the state (polis). Even if man is by nature a political animal, in the family, if not allowing private property, head of households may not do political activities.
The ultimate purpose of this paper is not to inquire into the relationship of the family and the state Aristotle declares, but to identity why the family should not miss out on the discourse of communalism, and the positive meaning which family has.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 처자공유제에 대한 비판
Ⅲ. 재산공유제에 대한 비판
Ⅳ. 가정(oikos)과 국가(polis)의 관계: 아리스토텔레스의 가정에 대한 입장
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-051-001278622