지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this article is to examine how Maruyama Masao, a famous Japanese intellectual/thinker dealt with colonial/nation questions, especially colonial Korea in his investigation of the building and deconstruction of Imperial Japan Maruyama’s personal experience of colonial Korea is extensive as many of his contemporaries in Japan. He witnessed Korean massacre in Kanto Great Earthquake. In addition, he spent part of his military service in Korea’s Pyungyang. His father Maruyama Kanji was a chief Editor of a newspaper published by the Japanese governor-general of Korea.
Despite such experiences, his theoretical account of colonial Korea is strangely missing, presumably because his theory of fascism fails to explain the question of colony. In other words, Maruyama’s fascism can show how Japanese society was transformed into anti-democratic political system. Yet, it is hard to explain how Japan expanded itself into an imperialistic nation. For him, the most important project was to consolidate democracy, while eliminating fascist elements in postcolonial Japan, leading to ‘the completion of modernity’ In Maruyama’s world, imperialistic expansion did not necessarily contradict the modernity. This explains the reason Maruyama kept silence on the question of colonial Korea. This research shows how his worldview and theory was constrained by eliminating the question. Ironically, Maruyama’s theoretical limitation manifested itself overtly by not answering ‘Chosun’ (Korea) question at all.
Despite such experiences, his theoretical account of colonial Korea is strangely missing, presumably because his theory of fascism fails to explain the question of colony. In other words, Maruyama’s fascism can show how Japanese society was transformed into anti-democratic political system. Yet, it is hard to explain how Japan expanded itself into an imperialistic nation. For him, the most important project was to consolidate democracy, while eliminating fascist elements in postcolonial Japan, leading to ‘the completion of modernity’ In Maruyama’s world, imperialistic expansion did not necessarily contradict the modernity. This explains the reason Maruyama kept silence on the question of colonial Korea. This research shows how his worldview and theory was constrained by eliminating the question. Ironically, Maruyama’s theoretical limitation manifested itself overtly by not answering ‘Chosun’ (Korea) question at all.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 마루야마와 조선의 접점, 그리고 조선 ‘체험’의 후경화
3. 마루야마의 파시즘론과 조선이라는 타자
4. 결론을 대신해서: ‘사상의 사상화’라는 방법
Abstract
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
다케우치 요시미: '이상'으로서의 아시아, '실재'로서의 아시아
함동주
문화과학
2001
.09
다케우치 요시미(竹內好)의 동아시아론 : 역사의 구조와 현상의 분리기획
고성빈
아세아연구
2012
.03
다케우치 요시미, 어둠 속에서 길을 찾다! : 다케우치 요시미, 윤여일 옮김, 『다케우치 요시미 선집』(휴머니스트, 2011)
최진호
코기토
2012
.02
마루야마 마사오의 〈영구혁명〉론 : 그 사상사적 계보
노병호
한국동양정치사상사연구
2013
.09
마루야마의 ‘고층(古層)’의 해석을 둘러싼 비판적 연구 : 역사의식의 고층과 메시아적 시간
김선화
일본문화연구
2014
.01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-905-001508640