지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.12
- 수록면
- 1,263 - 1,308 (46page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The main purpose of this work is to provide a proper understanding of the English law of constructive trust for the civil lawyer in Korea. The work introduces seven cases in which trust arises by operation of law under English legal system: those cases are as follows: Dispositions in Breach of Trust; Recipient Liability and Dishonest Assistance; Breach of No-Profit Rule; Acquisition of Property by Killing; Mutual Wills; Vendor-Purchaser Constructive Trust; When Settlor/Doner Has Done Everything He Can. Lawyers in civil jurisdictions normally consider the trust arising by operation of law as a trust relationship similar to a declared trust. The work argues that it is a misconception. In fact, considering that a beneficiary"s right is commonlyregarded as a proprietary right in its nature, imposition of a constructive trust in some English cases actually denotes the fact that a proprietary right is generated by operation of law in order to prevent some unjust consequences in individual cases. And, a constructive trust even arises sometimes when trust property never exists (i.e.,in cases involving dishonest assistance and knowing receipt); this tells us that the person called constructive trustee in those cases is actually not a person obliged to hold an asset on trust for another, thus, not a trustee at all; rather, he only owes a duty that requires him to make some monetary compensation to the beneficiary; and this obligation is established by operation of law. Therefore, lawyers in civil jurisdictions need not to conceptualize the English constructive trust as something corresponding to a declared trust: The reason it has been called constructive trust in England is due to its unique legal history that had divided its court system into common law court and equitable court. Since Korea and other civilian jurisdictions have not shared the same legal tradition and history, civil lawyers must grasp its underlying structure; it is a mechanism by which either a proprietary right or a personal right is created by operation of law.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 의제신탁(Constructive Trust)의 개념
Ⅲ. 擬制信託(Constructive Trust)이 인정되는 事例類型
Ⅳ. 擬制信託(Constructive Trust)에 대한 分析
Ⅵ. 結論: 하나의 법률용어, 다양한 메커니즘
〈참고문헌〉
〈부록〉 Resulting Trust: 設定意思推定型復歸信託과 自動成立型復歸信託
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Beatson, J. / 2010 / Burrows, Andrew and Cartwright, John, Anson's Law of Contract / OUP
2. [단행본] - Chambers, Robert / 1997 / Resulting Trusts / Clarendon Press
3. [단행본] - Conaglen, Matthew / 2010 / Fiduciary Loyalty: Protecting the Due Performance of Non-Fiduciary Duties / Hart Publishing
4. [단행본] - Finn, Paul / 1977 / Fiduciary Obligations / Law Book Company
5. [단행본] - Martin, Jill / 2009 / Hanbury & Martin: Modern Equity / Sweet & Maxwell
2. [단행본] - Chambers, Robert / 1997 / Resulting Trusts / Clarendon Press
3. [단행본] - Conaglen, Matthew / 2010 / Fiduciary Loyalty: Protecting the Due Performance of Non-Fiduciary Duties / Hart Publishing
4. [단행본] - Finn, Paul / 1977 / Fiduciary Obligations / Law Book Company
5. [단행본] - Martin, Jill / 2009 / Hanbury & Martin: Modern Equity / Sweet & Maxwell
이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)
-
대법원 1989. 4. 11. 선고 88다카11428 판결
가. 해상운송인이 화물운송중 자기나 사용인 등의 고의 또는 과실로 인하여 화물을 멸실 또는 훼손시킨 경우 화주는 운송인에 대하여 운송계약불이행으로 인한 손해배상과 불법행위로 인한 손해배상을 경합적으로 청구할 수 있다.
자세히 보기
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0