지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Discussions and conceptions of a Northeast Asian security regime or a multilateral security structure started, and was very active, in the mid-1990s. A tremendous amount of related studies have already been published. Still, there haven’t really been any done on North Korea’s perceptions and responses within the legislative dimension. With this absence in mind, this paper examines in detail the state’s perceptions and legislative responses concerning core issues relating to the formation of a security regime and the establishment of a construct of peace such as the North Korean nuclear problem as well as others. The paper draws its sources from primary North Korean documents.
This study first introduces the precedent cases of security regimes that have already been legislatively established and examines the limits to the legislative perspective. In addition, the paper analyses North Korea’s own plans and thoughts towards the construction of a security regime in Northeast Asia after reviewing the fundamental principles of North Korean legislation and the principles of international law. In addition, the paper looks into the ways in which North Korea’s attitudes and understanding of international law will play into the Northeast Asian security regime. These attempts will greatly contribute to predicting North Korean responses and policies in international law as the Six-Party Talks progress and serious discussions take place in detail about constructing a security regime in the region.
North Korea’s stance on international law is fixed on the principle of “respecting national sovereignty.” Along with this fundamental principle, North Korea also focuses on mutual equality, non-intervention, and non-aggression as the core of their understanding of international law; all principles that help secure the core principle of national sovereignty. As such, in the future as we look to construct a legislative structure for a Northeast Asian multilateral security regime, it is of utmost importance that we keep these perspectives in mind and prepare ways to secure the effectiveness of multilateral, as well as bilateral, agreements.
This study first introduces the precedent cases of security regimes that have already been legislatively established and examines the limits to the legislative perspective. In addition, the paper analyses North Korea’s own plans and thoughts towards the construction of a security regime in Northeast Asia after reviewing the fundamental principles of North Korean legislation and the principles of international law. In addition, the paper looks into the ways in which North Korea’s attitudes and understanding of international law will play into the Northeast Asian security regime. These attempts will greatly contribute to predicting North Korean responses and policies in international law as the Six-Party Talks progress and serious discussions take place in detail about constructing a security regime in the region.
North Korea’s stance on international law is fixed on the principle of “respecting national sovereignty.” Along with this fundamental principle, North Korea also focuses on mutual equality, non-intervention, and non-aggression as the core of their understanding of international law; all principles that help secure the core principle of national sovereignty. As such, in the future as we look to construct a legislative structure for a Northeast Asian multilateral security regime, it is of utmost importance that we keep these perspectives in mind and prepare ways to secure the effectiveness of multilateral, as well as bilateral, agreements.
목차
1. 서론
2. 국제안보레짐의 현황과 법제도적 한계
3. 동북아 안보레짐과 북한의 국제법적 인식
5. 북한 국제법관의 동북아 안보레짐에의 적용가능성
6. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (43)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 김일성종합대학 / 1992 / 국제법학(법학부용) / 김일성종합대학출판사
2. [단행본] - 김영철 / 1988 / 현대 국제법연구 / 과학백과사전종합출판사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김정국 / 2006 / 조선반도 평화보장문제해결의 근본방도 / 정치법률연구 (2)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김창혁 / 2008 / 미일안보체제는 침략적인 군사동맹체제 / 김일성종합대학학보: 력사법학 54 (4)
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 리경철 / 2005 / 국제조약법에서 보류의 의미와 그 특징 / 정치법률연구 (1)
2. [단행본] - 김영철 / 1988 / 현대 국제법연구 / 과학백과사전종합출판사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김정국 / 2006 / 조선반도 평화보장문제해결의 근본방도 / 정치법률연구 (2)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김창혁 / 2008 / 미일안보체제는 침략적인 군사동맹체제 / 김일성종합대학학보: 력사법학 54 (4)
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 리경철 / 2005 / 국제조약법에서 보류의 의미와 그 특징 / 정치법률연구 (1)
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동북아 질서 변화에 대한 북한의 법인식
통일정책연구
2010 .01
-
북한 핵문제와 다자주의적 접근의 유용성
국제정치연구
2010 .06
-
North Korean Refugees, Regime Stability and East Asian Regional Peace and Security
한국국제정치학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2010 .08
-
동북아 안보레짐 형성연구 : OSCE의 경험을 중심으로
사회과학연구
2004 .02
-
전통적ㆍ비전통적 안보측면에서 본 북한과 국제기구의 관계
국제관계연구
2006 .03
-
An Assessment of the Security Environment and Challenges in the Post-Cheonan Era: A South Korean Perspective
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2010 .01
-
천안함 사태가 북핵 6자회담에 미치는 영향 : 동북아 평화안보협력체제 구축에 미치는 영향을 중심으로
아시아연구
2010 .06
-
Changes in North Korea and Policy Responses of the International Community toward North Korea
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2009 .09
-
The Change of North Korea and the Security of the Korean Peninsula
사회과학연구
1996 .12
-
Building a Security Community in Northeast Asia: Options and Challenges
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2009 .01
-
China and the Obstacles to the Northeast Asian Security Multilateralism : With Emphasis Put upon the North Korea Problem
한반도선진화재단 기타 단행본
2011 .04
-
China and the Korean Peninsula: A Chinese View on the North Korean Nuclear Issue
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2007 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0