메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김항섭 (한신대)
저널정보
한신대학교 종교와문화연구소(구 한신인문학연구소) 종교문화연구 종교문화연구 제11호
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
1 - 26 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper is to analyse critically the so-called ‘Economics of Religion’ or ‘Theory of Religious Economy’, which has been initiated by American social scientists of religion, inclusive of Rodney Stark, in the late 1980s.
Economics of Religion studies religious phenomena in the perspective of the theoretical frame and principal concepts of Rational Choice Theory, originated in the Neoclassical microeconomics. This theory assumes that humans act to maximize their benefits in accordance with their preferences.
The theorists of Economics of Religion argue that the religious activities are possible to describe and predict by this theory. The individuals-consumers buy the religious goods and services, provided by the religious firms or enterprises, which try to maximize the number of theirs members, forming the religious market or economy.
In this religious market, there are two types: of religious monopoly and free market. In the monopoly, the suppliers tend to be indolent and the religious indifference is predominant. On the contrary, in the free market the religious suppliers compete with the others in maximizing their market share and this competition promotes the religious vitality.
But many scientists are critical of such an economic approach. One of more general criticisms is that the humans do not act necessarily in the rational manner because of their intrinsic limits. Another is that this approach reduces the complex religious activities only to economic dimension.
But the more serious problem is that this approach is based on the fetishism of free market and its theories. But, if we screen out these fetishist elements, we do not need to exclude this approach and its concepts. Our concern is toward a model that explains synthetically the complex activities beyond the Economics of Religion. In this context, is useful the gift economy model, proposed by the Mauss group.

목차

Ⅰ. 두 가지 이야기
Ⅱ. 종교경제학의 주요 내용
Ⅲ. 종교경제학에 대한 비판
Ⅵ. 종교경제학, 경제인류학과 ‘경제종교학’: 결론을 대신하여
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-205-000838033