메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김희영 (한양대학교)
저널정보
한국근현대미술사학회 한국근현대미술사학 한국근현대미술사학 제19집
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
69 - 93 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The newly acquired American economic and political power after WWII played a substantial role in promoting Abstract Expressionism. Although American Abstract Expressionist style was introduced to Korea as a cultural signifier of freedom, sovereignty, democracy, modernity, and capitalism, a new abstraction in Korea was to be called Informel, named after French Art Informel. The focal point of this paper is the ambivalent term Informel, which was taken to name the first Korean avant-garde art, which had the burden of decolonization and modernization. Come as a belated form of modern art, it was not until the 1960s when the term Informel was officially used to describe the new Korean art. The term Informel provides a productive space to investigate the development of Korean avant-garde art in a space of ‘time-lag.’ Korean Informel implies the gap between the original formation of American Abstract Expressionism in the 1940s and the local reception of it in Korea in the 1950s. The course of the Korean artists’ adoption of western avant-garde does not complete a universal history of modernization naturally progressed through a ‘homogenous time.’ By tracing the apparently incoherent course of ‘cultural translation,’ this paper argues that Informel reveals the uneasy course of the formation of the first Korean avantgarde art.
As to the Korean reception of Abstract Expressionism, questions can be posed whether it was a deflection of the formalist Modernist aesthetic, or an eclectic reception of its alternatives. Clement Greenberg’s aesthetic autonomy was absent in the discussion of Korean art critics and artists upon their reception of the new abstract art. Instead, Korean artists and art critics referred to Harold Rosenberg’s concept of ‘Action Painting’ and Michel Tapie’s ‘art autre.’ This paper argues that Korean artists decoded the cultural sign of Abstract Expressionism and negotiated with the dominant art form in their particular cultural and political milieu. Korean avant-garde artists sought an innovative style, which would help dismantle the unwanted colonial past by searching out a new way to express their pathos.

목차

I. 미국 추상표현주의에 연관된 모더니즘 담론의 형성배경
II. 전후 추상을 이해하는 대안적 담론 : ‘행동 회화(Action Painting)’와 ‘다른 종류의 예술(Un Art Autre)’
III. 전후 한국 앵포르멜 담론의 형성과정에 대한 고찰
IV. 한국 앵포르멜 담론 형성에 대한 시대적 해명
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (47)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-600-000632489