지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aim of this paper is to review the history of studies on oil painting and visual culture of the past 20 years. Early modern art scholars dealt with the oil painting of Korea during the modern period only as a part of colonial art distorted by Japan. But the inclusion in art history of the artists who defected to North Korea is a characteristic that differentiates early modern art history from the art history of the post-1950s.
With the development of the art market in the 1970s and other changes in the art environment such as the National Museum of Contemporary Art’s planned exhibitions and discovery of new works, the study of modern Korean art history began in earnest. At the time, critics saw the history of modern oil painting as an unfolding of Greenberg’s modernism. In other words, they created a stylistic pedigree, from the Impressionists of the Japanese colonial era to the Informel of the 1960s~70s and to Korean minimalism, and made abstract art the mainstream art of Korea. Such formalism began to be criticized by Minjung Art critics after the 1980s. Through studies of the 1920s and ‘40s socialist art as well as of the artists who defected to North Korea, rather than modernism, Minjung Art critics sought to restore the disregarded relationship between art and society.
Oil painting studies after the 1990s went beyond the dichotomous conflict of modernism and realism and became more diverse. Scholars trained by university art history departments appeared, and various methodologies including post-structuralism, Feminism, Post Colonialism emerged. The research interests of this period were in the social contexts in which modernity and race are constructed, instead of style or class. Also studies attempting critical and deconstructive reading of not only abstract art that has been the mainstream art for some 40 years but also Minjung Art are gradually increasing. But as these studies lean heavily toward an art movement or group study, they lack considerations of analysis or methodology regarding artists or their works. Hence considerations of empirical studies and new methodologies regarding artists and art works must be done side by side in the future.
With the development of the art market in the 1970s and other changes in the art environment such as the National Museum of Contemporary Art’s planned exhibitions and discovery of new works, the study of modern Korean art history began in earnest. At the time, critics saw the history of modern oil painting as an unfolding of Greenberg’s modernism. In other words, they created a stylistic pedigree, from the Impressionists of the Japanese colonial era to the Informel of the 1960s~70s and to Korean minimalism, and made abstract art the mainstream art of Korea. Such formalism began to be criticized by Minjung Art critics after the 1980s. Through studies of the 1920s and ‘40s socialist art as well as of the artists who defected to North Korea, rather than modernism, Minjung Art critics sought to restore the disregarded relationship between art and society.
Oil painting studies after the 1990s went beyond the dichotomous conflict of modernism and realism and became more diverse. Scholars trained by university art history departments appeared, and various methodologies including post-structuralism, Feminism, Post Colonialism emerged. The research interests of this period were in the social contexts in which modernity and race are constructed, instead of style or class. Also studies attempting critical and deconstructive reading of not only abstract art that has been the mainstream art for some 40 years but also Minjung Art are gradually increasing. But as these studies lean heavily toward an art movement or group study, they lack considerations of analysis or methodology regarding artists or their works. Hence considerations of empirical studies and new methodologies regarding artists and art works must be done side by side in the future.
#한국근대미술사(韓國近代美術史)
#한국현대미술사(韓國現代美術史)
#서양화(西洋畵)
#시각문화(視覺文化)
#이경성(李慶成)
#이구열(李龜烈)
#오광수(吳光洙)
#한국근현대미술사학회
#국립현대미술관
#Korean Modern Art
#The Association of Korean Modern Art History
#Colored ink painting
#Oriental painting
#Lee Kyongsung(李慶成)
#Lee Kuyul(李龜烈)
#Oh Kwangsoo(吳光洙)
#The Association of Korean Modern &
# Contemporary Art History
목차
I. 들어가는 말
II. 1990년대 이전 서양화 연구사
III. 1990년대 이후 연구환경의 변화
IV. 1990년대 이후 서양화 연구경향
V. 나가며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (74)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-600-003541718