메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Il-jae Lee (Kwangwoon University)
저널정보
한국응용언어학회 응용언어학 응용언어학 제28권 4호
발행연도
2012.12
수록면
131 - 155 (25page)
DOI
10.17154/kjal.2012.12.28.4.131

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper argues against an assumption in relative clause (RC) acquisition (1) that direct object (DO) RC is more difficult than subject (SUB) RC in L2 as well as L1 (Hsu, Hermon, & Zukowski, 2009; Kwon, Peter, Lee, Kluender, & Polinsky, 2010) and (2) that the distance between head NP and gap in RC determines processing difficulty born in RCs (the Structural Distance Hypothesis; the SDH) (O’Grady, Lee, & Choo, 2003). According to the SDH, the structural distance is deeper in DO RC than in SUB RC. This paper raises a concern that unaccusative (UNA) RC can pose a problem to this assumption because UNA RC is a SUB RC but its structural distance is the same with DO RC. A cross-sectional oral-translation elicitation task was employed to investigate this contradiction with sixty-seven adult L1 Korean learners of English. The findings reveal that (1) UNA RC is more difficult than SUB RC and DO RC and (2) that UNA RC and DO RC bear different processing difficulties despite the same structural distance. This paper proposes that the source of difficulty born in UNA RC lies with the probe T in search of its matching goal, having a different featural agreement route from SUB RC and DO RC.

목차

I. Introduction
II. Experiment
III. Data Interpretation
IV. Summary and Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0