메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
권명식 (한국외국어대학교)
저널정보
한국아프리카학회 한국아프리카학회지 韓國아프리카學會誌 第37輯
발행연도
2012.12
수록면
3 - 49 (47page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
There are two main objects in studying the African languages typologically. According to the Greenberg(1963a) we are searching for the universals of human language comparing the structure of genetically unrelated languages. In this line we are also searching for the diversities of the grammatical structures which do not violate the limit of the linguistic structure. Secondly we do study the language structure in order to know the relationship with other neighboring languages. Nilotic languages, which belong to the Nilo-Saharan language family, have been least studied because of the difficulties of access in the area where they are spoken. In this article I tried to characterize the main features of the structure typologically. I divided them into three parts, namely the phonological, morphological and syntactic properties. I found many interesting features, like whispered, breathy and creaky voices, which are contrasted to differentiate lexical meaning and also the grammatical functions like number category. ATR feature functions to harmonize the vowel within word. Within consonant system I found that Nilotics lack fricative sound completely, and if there is any, it is /h/ or /s/.
To mark the grammatical relationship within clause, most Nilotic utilize three main strategies, namely word order, case marking and subject, object pronominal agreement marking on verb. There are, however some varieties according to the constituents-order. Western Nilotic language like Dinke, Shilluk have basically OVS order, however in determining the order it seems that the discourse pragmatic factors like topicalization play more important role. Case marking is represented not by affixes as we know often, but by non-linear elements like tone or voicing features. At the end, we tried to explain why Luo or Datooga, so called languages in periphery have in some sense the deviated features like word order or tense system. In conclusion, we come to consider the influences from neighboring languages like Bantu, Central Sudanic or Cushitic. Due to the contact, the grammatical structure can be changed drastically.

목차

1. 서론
2. 나일어의 계통분류
3. 소리구조
4. 단어구조
5. 문장구조
6. 문법 범주와 패러다임 구조
7. 접촉과 언어구조 변화
8. 맺는 말
〈참고문헌〉
Abstract

참고문헌 (61)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-309-000620736