메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
지광운 (한양대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제39집
발행연도
2012.8
수록면
455 - 482 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Japanese Corporation Act was enacted in 2005, and there is much debate today on the Interim Proposal made by the Ministry of Justice of Japan to amend the Corporation Act. The Core subjects of the discussion are first corporate governance and second framework for the parentsubsidiary relationship regulation.
This paper regards the regulatory regime for parent-subsidiary companies, there is much attention on the multiple-derivative lawsuits.
The current Commercial Act of Korea has only the provisions regulating independent individual companies, and the construction theories of such provisions do not care about the relationship of a parent company and its subsidiaries almostly. Due to these circumstances, the definite means do not exist to regulate the powers and liability of a parent company in connection with the performance of business by its subsidiaries as well as to protect the subsidiaries’ minority shareholders.
For appropriate operation of the affiliate companies, the relationship between parent and subsidiary companies needs to be definitely settled through construction of theories of the laws concerned or enaction of new regulations.
When parent company decided to proceed with any project in favour of parent company, but in detriment of subsidiary, the shareholders of subsidiary would suffer damage through going down of stock price they hold. Such a decision would have positive effect for conglomerate in the whole, but could be against subsidiary’s interests. It is important, therefore, to protect minor shareholders of subsidiary within conglomerate.
To make the conglomerate function well, systematic policy measures should be taken to enable a enterprise group of parent-subsidiary companies to govern and guarantee its subsidiaries, formally and substantially. In due consideration of these circumstances, this paper provides some reviews of major issues concerning the operation of each subsidiary belonging to the enterprise group of a holding company, such as the powers and liability of the parent company’s and rights of shareholders, the protection of each subsidiary’s minority shareholders and duty of disclosure of the parent company.
This paper examines the recent discussion of the possible amendment to the Japanese Corporation Act contained in the Proposal and examines how the Japanese debate can become an additional context and ground for further reform in relation to the regulation of parent-subsidiary companies on the Korea Commercial Act.

목차

I. 머리말
II. 일본 회사법 개정 중간시안 상 모자회사 규율에 관한 내용
III. 모자회사 규율에 관한 일본의 해석론과 입법론
IV. 우리나라에서의 논의 및 시사점
V. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (5)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)

  • 대법원 2004. 9. 23. 선고 2003다49221 판결

    어느 한 회사가 다른 회사의 주식의 전부 또는 대부분을 소유하여 양자간에 지배종속관계에 있고, 종속회사가 그 이사 등의 부정행위에 의하여 손해를 입었다고 하더라도, 지배회사와 종속회사는 상법상 별개의 법인격을 가진 회사이고, 대표소송의 제소자격은 책임추궁을 당하여야 하는 이사가 속한 당해 회사의 주주로 한정되어 있으므로, 종속회사의 주주가

    자세히 보기

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-360-000510687