메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
한송이 (경북대학교) 장성만 (경북대학교)
저널정보
대한생물치료정신의학회 생물치료정신의학 생물치료정신의학 제18권 제2호
발행연도
2012.12
수록면
120 - 128 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objectives:The Mini-Mental State Examination is arguably the most widely used screening measure for cognitive impairment. The aims of this study are to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Mini-Mental State Examination- Korean Version(MMSE-KC) as a quantitative measure of cognitive ability.
Methods:Data were analyzed from a total of 312 participants age 65 or older from cross-sectional community-based study, which were collected about demographic information and individual item responses to MMSE-KC. Item response theory was used to analyze individual items.
Results:Comparison of the data with a unidimensional 2-parameter model indicated that the total score obtained by summing across all items yields a reliable(0.78) quantitative estimate of global cognitive ability. All items fit the model and together spanned a range of difficulty(threshold parameter) from -3.86(easier) to 1.15(more difficult) logits, and discrimination(slope parameter) from 0.55 to 8.6 logits. The items about ‘recall of three words’ and ‘attention’ were the most difficult items and have most powerful discrimination parameter. Copying pentagons and time(year) orientation were more difficult than the other items. The patients with dementia showed differential item functioning such items as orientation to place, the last two items of ‘recall of three words’, the last two items of ‘attention’, and ‘three stage command’.
Conclusion:The MMSE-KC can provide a reliable and valid quantitative estimate of cognitive ability. More attention should be paid to the difficult items like ‘recall of three words’ and ‘attention’ for the discrimination of dementia from non-dementia people.

목차

서론
대상 및 방법
결과
고찰
결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-513-000468458