지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper, I analized the identification of the Ruined Koguryo People using the memorial inscription in Tang period, and proved that the Chinese in Tang Period acknowledged Koguryo People as the Korean ancesters identifying the one with Chosun, Samhan, Buyo and Jinhan, which meant that Koguryo belonged to the Korean history.
I analized epitaph of the Ruined Koguryo People which showed birthplace or identity, family histoy of the dead. A few Korean and Chinese students argued that some Ruined Koguryo People were assimilated by Chinese, because they insisted that they are a distinguished family of Bohai (渤海), i.e. Bohai Gao family (渤海高氏). But I maintained that it is not absolutely true because it was related with non-Chinese people or census registration policy. First, Tang government recognied that the second generation of non-Chinese people imigrated or moved by conquest were Chinese subject at law. So they have one’s legal domicile designated by Chinese province or county names. Second, Chinese government disagreed that the conquered identifed their ex-independent country. So it insisted that ex-opponent never used their country name, which applied to Koguryo as well as Turk and Uighur. Third, Some conquored Koguryo People were general or soldiers, so they moved the army posts in capital or frontiers, which was reconied their birth place or registered domicile.
Some Chinese wrote epitaph of the Ruined Koguryo People and identfied the other with people of Chosun, Samhan, Buyo and Jinhan, which were ancestrial Korean countries. they were synonyms of Koguryo in context of the memorial inscription. This proved that Chinese in Tang Period recognized both have same historical identity as well as ethnic, cutural, or social similarity. Many contemporary Chinese insisted Koguryo pertained to Chinese history, but their ancesrter in Tang period already agreed that Koguryo was one of the Korean ancient countries in Korean History.
I analized epitaph of the Ruined Koguryo People which showed birthplace or identity, family histoy of the dead. A few Korean and Chinese students argued that some Ruined Koguryo People were assimilated by Chinese, because they insisted that they are a distinguished family of Bohai (渤海), i.e. Bohai Gao family (渤海高氏). But I maintained that it is not absolutely true because it was related with non-Chinese people or census registration policy. First, Tang government recognied that the second generation of non-Chinese people imigrated or moved by conquest were Chinese subject at law. So they have one’s legal domicile designated by Chinese province or county names. Second, Chinese government disagreed that the conquered identifed their ex-independent country. So it insisted that ex-opponent never used their country name, which applied to Koguryo as well as Turk and Uighur. Third, Some conquored Koguryo People were general or soldiers, so they moved the army posts in capital or frontiers, which was reconied their birth place or registered domicile.
Some Chinese wrote epitaph of the Ruined Koguryo People and identfied the other with people of Chosun, Samhan, Buyo and Jinhan, which were ancestrial Korean countries. they were synonyms of Koguryo in context of the memorial inscription. This proved that Chinese in Tang Period recognized both have same historical identity as well as ethnic, cutural, or social similarity. Many contemporary Chinese insisted Koguryo pertained to Chinese history, but their ancesrter in Tang period already agreed that Koguryo was one of the Korean ancient countries in Korean History.
목차
I. 머리말
II. 高句麗遺民묘지명 本籍표기
III. 唐治下異民族의 郡縣名본적 표기의 배경
IV. 묘지명의 高句麗別稱과 高句麗認識
V. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
唐代 高句麗 표기 기피현상 : 隋唐 墓誌銘의 國名 표기 분석을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2012 .12
-
4~5세기 고구려에 유입된 중국계 인물의 동향-문헌자료를 중심으로-
한국고대사연구
2003 .12
-
중화인민공화국 학계의 고구려 유민 연구 검토
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
고구려 후기 고구려, 수ㆍ당, 북방 제국의 대립관계
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
高句麗史
성곡논총
1997 .07
-
韓國 史書에 나타난 高句麗의 正體性
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
高句麗에 流入된 中國系人物의 動向 : 4~5世紀의 考古學 資料를 中心으로
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
中國學界의 高句麗 對外關係史 硏究現況
한국고대사연구
2003 .09
-
高麗의 高句麗 繼承意識
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
中國 所在 高句麗 遺民의 동향
한국고대사연구
2001 .09
-
北方民族史에서 본 高句麗의 正體性 : 鮮卑, 契丹, 柔然을 중심으로
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
唐朝의 高句麗人軍事集團
동북아역사논총
2009 .06
-
高句麗 '民族'問題 認識의 現況과 課題
한국고대사연구
2003 .09
-
中國 內 高句麗遺蹟에서 出土된 高句麗土器 硏究
중국사연구
2007 .01
-
고구려와 북방민족의 관계에 대한 중화인민공화국 학계의 견해
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
고구려 벽화를 통해서 본 고구려의 정체성 연구
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
고구려 발해의 상관성 연구와 과제
고구려발해연구
2008 .07
-
墓誌로 본 在唐 高句麗 遺民의 祖先意識의 變化
대구사학
2010 .01
-
高句麗 古墳壁畵와 同時代 中國 北方民族 古墳美術과의 比較硏究
고구려발해연구
2007 .09
-
2007년 이후 중국의 고구려 종교 · 사상사 연구 동향
고구려발해연구
2017 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-002364050