지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
According to animal rights discourses, speciesism can be no more accepted than racism or sexism. These discourses can be understood as the application to animals of anti-anthropocentric ecological theories such as Roderick Nash’s ethical extensionism and the rights of nature. Never permitting any animals to be killed for hunting and fishing as if they were human, however, would be to apply to non-humans what can be applied only to humans. It could be ironically labeled as a human-focused perspective.
Nick’s journey in “Big Two-Hearted River” explores the possibility of feeling oneness with nature through trout fishing. He participates as a member of the ecosystem: he does not catch small trout or use small grasshoppers as baits and he gives to other animals such as minks the parts of the trout he does not eat. At the same time, it is significant that the final section of the story suggests a dark ‘tragic’ side to fishing, an idea which takes center stage in Trout Fishing in America. To be precise, what is portrayed in Trout Fishing in America is not trout fishing in America, but its failure and frustrations. More remarkably, Trout Fishing in America hints at the dangers of fishing under the situation in which lives of fish are taken away ‘against the natural order of death’ and the stream for fish sells at a junkyard.
It is clear that hunting and fishing are essentially man-made activities, but they can be also regarded as ‘natural’ in the sense that they contribute to the energy cycle of the ecosystem. Considering the unprecedented power of human technology in our hands today, however, the matter of how appropriate human intervention can occur in nature’s ecosystem as in the case of hunting and fishing is surely a vital environmental issue.
Nick’s journey in “Big Two-Hearted River” explores the possibility of feeling oneness with nature through trout fishing. He participates as a member of the ecosystem: he does not catch small trout or use small grasshoppers as baits and he gives to other animals such as minks the parts of the trout he does not eat. At the same time, it is significant that the final section of the story suggests a dark ‘tragic’ side to fishing, an idea which takes center stage in Trout Fishing in America. To be precise, what is portrayed in Trout Fishing in America is not trout fishing in America, but its failure and frustrations. More remarkably, Trout Fishing in America hints at the dangers of fishing under the situation in which lives of fish are taken away ‘against the natural order of death’ and the stream for fish sells at a junkyard.
It is clear that hunting and fishing are essentially man-made activities, but they can be also regarded as ‘natural’ in the sense that they contribute to the energy cycle of the ecosystem. Considering the unprecedented power of human technology in our hands today, however, the matter of how appropriate human intervention can occur in nature’s ecosystem as in the case of hunting and fishing is surely a vital environmental issue.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 동물권리 담론의 생태비평적 조응과 미국 전원에서의 사냥
3. 『두 마음을 가진 커다란 강』 : 자연에 의한 치유와 회복
4. 『미국의 송어낚시』: 거듭된 좌절과 자연으로부터의 유리
5. 결어: 사냥/낚시를 통한 자연 생태계의 인간 개입
〈인용문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-800-003337821