지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.5
- 수록면
- 51 - 57 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In more recent times, “nomad” has stood for the ways of modern citizen’s adapting life style for the swift changing societies which repeatedly have appeared and disappeared, getting out of settlement.
Deleuze and guattari have defined Nomadic Thought as ‘the way of thinking in line’ and this is not just state of a material but ‘the meaning of the creation according to the concept of the events’, as ‘rhizome thought’ which has a non-hierarchical and multi centers.
Nomadic Thought is a flow of desire through the thinking in line, ‘smooth space’ in the escaping line, and as a creation of the incidental notion, ‘the space of incident’, in addition to as “rhizome spatial” notion of the meaning that means the novel order system and connects each different features. There are two major properties; one is spatial side and the other is programing side.
The character of the spatial character has appeared as ‘flexibility’ for space depending on the flow of the flexible mobile line, ‘non-territorial character’ of boundary extinction by fluid and continual spatial flows, and ‘an experiential property’ through antennal-space-build up. The character of programing side has appeared ‘changeability’ of fluid programs, ‘mobility’ of non-territorial programs, and ‘non-hierarchical property’ of rhizome program. With these space design characters of nomadic thought, we have studied the nomadic phenomenon in the smart-office environment as a spatial side and programing side.
This smart-office means as ‘flexibility’ for space depending on the flow of the worker’s mobile line, ‘non-territorial character’ of boundary extinction between the work and the rest, and ‘an experiential property’ through communion with working space and the worker. In the character of programing side, there has been ‘changeability’ of various-functional transform for space, ‘mobility’ in the abolition of fixed-seats, and ‘non-hierarchical property’ of space for invigoration in information exchanging followed by the magnified importance of the team-work.
Deleuze and guattari have defined Nomadic Thought as ‘the way of thinking in line’ and this is not just state of a material but ‘the meaning of the creation according to the concept of the events’, as ‘rhizome thought’ which has a non-hierarchical and multi centers.
Nomadic Thought is a flow of desire through the thinking in line, ‘smooth space’ in the escaping line, and as a creation of the incidental notion, ‘the space of incident’, in addition to as “rhizome spatial” notion of the meaning that means the novel order system and connects each different features. There are two major properties; one is spatial side and the other is programing side.
The character of the spatial character has appeared as ‘flexibility’ for space depending on the flow of the flexible mobile line, ‘non-territorial character’ of boundary extinction by fluid and continual spatial flows, and ‘an experiential property’ through antennal-space-build up. The character of programing side has appeared ‘changeability’ of fluid programs, ‘mobility’ of non-territorial programs, and ‘non-hierarchical property’ of rhizome program. With these space design characters of nomadic thought, we have studied the nomadic phenomenon in the smart-office environment as a spatial side and programing side.
This smart-office means as ‘flexibility’ for space depending on the flow of the worker’s mobile line, ‘non-territorial character’ of boundary extinction between the work and the rest, and ‘an experiential property’ through communion with working space and the worker. In the character of programing side, there has been ‘changeability’ of various-functional transform for space, ‘mobility’ in the abolition of fixed-seats, and ‘non-hierarchical property’ of space for invigoration in information exchanging followed by the magnified importance of the team-work.
목차
Abstract
1. 서론
2. 스마트 오피스의 등장배경 및 유형
3. 유목적 사고의 공간 디자인 특성
4. 유목적 업무환경 변화에 따른 스마트 오피스 공간 디자인 특성 분석
5. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-610-003308246